A few of the main people of 2022.
Law is a people business, so it's only right that RollOnFriday spotlights the individuals who defined the legal landscape in 2022, or at least one orange website's deranged interpretation of it.
Plenty of people provided ROF with the opportunity to highlight how great members of the legal community can be. In January, Brabners trainee Umar Tahir raised tens of thousands of pounds for Syrian refugees, while Andrea Fraser cycled from Lviv to Edinburgh to support mothers and babies in Ukraine - after the human rights lawyer had delivered an ambulance full of medical equipment to the region. Bit much, really.
Maya Yenn, known within RPC as Maya Whatton, served as a role model for anyone harbouring dreams of creative fulfillment with her award-winning alt-pop song. In law, Gordon Aspden KC deployed the greatest callback of the year when he trapped a murderer using the same questions which snared Crippen over a hundred years ago.
Others didn't so much do something good, as prove they had not been bad. Anna Palus extracted an apology from temperamental tennis ace Nick Krygios after he accused the lawyer of being smashed at the Wimbledon final in front of a TV audience of millions, but most lawyers were exonerated in more low-key circumstances - primarily via the SRA dropping its investigation into them. That was the result for Caroline Stroud, the former Freshfields partner who was subjected to a three year investigation into her handling of a rape probe for UBS, before it was canned by the SRA.
The regulator also decided not to bring a fresh case against Claire Matthews, the junior solicitor struck off for lying about losing a briefcase containing client documents, who was reinstated on appeal.
Other lawyers beat off attempts to destroy them which were made by, variously, a client's vengeful ex-husband, a rabid dog-breeding medical research company and, in the case of Withers associate Hannah Robinson, an aggrieved property developer - she was cleared in the Court of Appeal.
Three lawyers successfully sued their firms for binning them when they fell ill. Elona Onibere was ejected from Rodman Pearce following cancer treatment, Daniel Russell was not retained by RLK Solicitors after he collapsed and had to undergo emergency surgery, and Gulnaz Raja was sacked by Starling Bank after having the temerity to suffer from asthma. Georgina Hennessy had no problem with her employer - the Clifford Chance secretary sued Sainsburys for £500k after slipping over.
Unbelievably, some deluded fools left the legal sector, like the law grad who decided she'd have more success gaming, and the lawyer who quit to become a pet medium.
A barrister made headlines when he left a plane, although it wasn't of his own volition. Charles Banner KC was escorted onto the tarmac by police after he objected to the nanny being seated apart from his children. ROF occasionally watches the footage of the incident when it needs a good cringe.
Lawyers gained their 15 minutes of fame in a variety of ways in 2022: by allegedly pretending to be a war hero, by slugging Moet in a Versace gown, by fantasising about sex with the head of a rape charity, and by pooing all over the communal areas of a Premier Inn. Clifford Chance's ex-head of tax, Dan Neidle, gained fans when he trained his guns on the former chancellor's interesting financial arrangements, and on his legal advisors.
It wasn't all good, though. A few lawyers would have benefitted from CM Murray's top tips on how not to get immolated over sex stuff. Like the Hogan Lovells associate who got gropey at karaoke, the Clydes partner whose cuddle at a strip club fared poorly, and the trainee who was sacked and fined £2k for slapping bums.
A former Eversheds Sutherland trainee, Thomas Hagyard, was banned from law after being jailed for sexually assaulting sleeping law students. A Travers associate left the firm after his inappropriate conduct, an Orrick associate alleged she was fondled by a partner, and a top partner was investigated by the SRA over sexual misconduct allegations (ROF understands he's now been handed back his management position).
Internecine issues bubbled over. Lawyers assaulted their colleagues, and even allegedly tried to murder them. At Simpson Thacher, one ripped off his shirt to fight a solicitor, while at BNP Paribas an in-house lawyer referred to a workmate as a "cheeky ch**k". And then called his bosses "c**ts". After which he left.
Professionally, errors of judgment did occur. Nicola Cain, once an RPC partner (since sacked), was disbarred and then banned from law when she was found to have forged a judge's signature and falsified court orders to mislead her famous client. Raymond McKeeve, while he was a partner at Jones Day, told a client to burn incriminating evidence. Only hurting herself, Zoya Kovalenko, a Kirkland associate, accidently left notes highlighting the weaknesses of her case in her claim against the firm.
Elsewhere, a former lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, Caroline Mitchell, was jailed for being naughty on a jury, while high-flying Neil Gerrard properly fouled up Dechert. A (now ex-) Gateley partner, Dean Copley, in retrospect, shouldn't have been quite so keen on securing gifts from a client.
There were swindles of all flavours: the AirMiles Job, in which a Skadden secretary had a lovely time crisscrossing the globe on the firm's dime; Timothy School's sprawling £20m ATM fraud; and the Scottish Castle caper, in which Stephen Jones essentially told the client his card hadn't gone through, and made him pay £10m twice.
In motoring news, a Slaughter and May partner escaped with a slap on the wrist after mowing down a pedestrian in Hong Kong, a Willkie Farr partner was rebuked for aiming his Merc at a gobby passerby, and a Knight in shining armour (his car) was fined for drink-driving having previously assaulted someone at his house. Fingers crossed for a sedate ride through '23 (no chance).
Check out the rest of the 2022 review:
Comments
166
308
We don't know if the Travers Smith associate's conduct was 'inappropriate' or not as we don't know what it was. We do know it was unlikely to have been serious.
282
150
The villains sound like my sort of people!
282
153
The fact that Ashurst instructed a KC to investigate shows that the Ashurst associate’s conduct was inappropriate and serious.
282
151
@ Anon 23 December 22 10:42 - yes, and the fact that he was dismissed also tells us that his conduct was inappropriate.
165
275
@10.41 - why 'sort of' people - are they people or aren't they?
266
134
The C M Murray 'tips' weren't entirely serious methinks.
151
273
@23rd @ 10.42 - we know the conduct of the associate at Ashurst wasn't inappropriate or serious because the allegations were against an associate at Travers Smith. Since there were no allegations against an associate at Ashurst there was no KC brought in by Ashurst.
We don't know if the conduct of the associate at Travers Smith was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was. We know it wasn't serious because they brought in a KC.
143
283
Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Unfortunately false allegations are very common in relation to 'sexual harassment'.
141
291
@23rd @11.40 - we don't know if the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was. The fact he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate.
299
133
Anonymous 24 December 22 05:24:
We know the conduct of the associate at Ashurst was inappropriate and serious because the allegations were against an associate at Ashurst. There were allegations against an associate at Ashurst, which is why Ashurst brought in a KC.
We know that the conduct of the associate at Ashurst was inappropriate because they brought in a KC and the associate was dismissed.
287
137
Anonymous 24 December 22 06:09: Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place. Fortunately, false allegations are very uncommon in relation to sexual harassment.
142
284
@8.58 - but there was no allegations about conduct at Ashurst. Your false allegation that there was is an example of false allegations relating to sex, which are very common.
158
269
Anonymous 24 December 22 08.58: No, Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
Unfortunately, false allegations are very uncommon in relation to sexual harassment, your claim that Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place being a case in point.
148
266
Anonymous 24 December 22 09:55: but there were allegations about conduct at Ashurst. Your false allegation to the contrary is an example of false allegations relating to sex - but thankfully such false allegations are not common.
267
138
Anonymous 24 December 22 16:11:
No, Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place.
Fortunately, false allegations are very uncommon in relation to sexual harassment, but your claim that Freshfields did investigate the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place is (albeit a rare) example of such an allegation.
283
148
Anonymous 24 December 22 08:48: we know that the conduct was inappropriate because a KC was instructed to investigate. You don’t instruct a third party to investigate - and a Silk, at that - non-serious matters. The fact he was dismissed also indicates that the conduct was inappropriate. You don’t dismiss someone for non-serious conduct.
259
138
It wasn’t me. It’s all your fault!
151
269
Anonymous 24 December 22 08.58: No, Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
Unfortunately, false allegations are very common in relation to sexual harassment, your claim that Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place being a case in point.
281
149
So we are all agreed:
(1) Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found that the groping took place.
(2) False allegations are not very common in relation to sexual harassment.
147
269
Anonymous 24 December 22 19:30 No, Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
Unfortunately, false allegations are very common in relation to sexual harassment, your claim that Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place being a case in point.
144
272
Anonymous 24 December 22 19:21: nope, the allegations were at Travers Smith, not Ashurst. Your false allegation that there were allegations at Ashurst is an example of false allegations relating to sex, which are very common.
142
247
Anonymous 24 December 22 19:36 : we don't know if the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
The fact they brought in a KC and that he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was. You do bring in KCs and dismiss people for non-serious conduct, but we don't know if the conduct was serious.
128
242
@Tiny Cockfail - what was whose fault?
269
138
So we are all still agreed:
(1) Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found that the groping took place.
(2) False allegations are not very common in relation to sexual harassment.
261
136
Anonymous 26 December 22 08:27: so you agree that the allegations were at Ashurst and groping was found to have taken place; and that false allegations of sexual impropriety are uncommon.
264
128
Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place.
Fortunately, false allegations are very uncommon in relation to sexual harassment.
267
119
The fact that Ashurst instructed a KC to investigate shows that the Ashurst associate’s conduct was inappropriate and serious.
253
125
Anonymous 23 December 22 13:25: u ok hun?
131
253
If true, the Hogan Lovells allegations were a police matter, not an HR one.
126
243
@25th @ 18.23 & 26th @ 13.51 @ 26th @ 13.56 - no, Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
Unfortunately, false allegations are very common in relation to sexual harassment, your claim that Freshfields investigated the Orrick case and found evidence that the groping took place being a case in point.
134
238
Anonymous 26 December 22 13:54: nope, the allegations were still at Travers Smith, not Ashurst. Your false allegation that there were allegations at Ashurst is an example of false allegations relating to sex, which are very common.
132
228
Anonymous 26 December 22 13:56 : no, we don't know if the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
The fact they brought in a KC and that he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was. You do bring in KCs and dismiss people for non-serious conduct, but we don't know if the conduct was serious.
244
135
Anonymous 26 December 22 17:16: but also appropriate for HR to investigate.
232
138
Anon 26 December 22 13:56: quite. You’d only bring a KC in to investigate a serious matter.
239
128
Anon 26 December 22 13:56: a fair inference, yes.
122
234
Anonymous 26 December 22 14:39: the question is are you?
134
233
Anonymous 27 December 22 22:06: no, if true it was a police matter.
220
143
The allegations were at Ashurst, not Travers Smith.
155
231
@27 @ 22.08 - we don't know if the matter was serious because we dont know what the matter was. The fact they brought in a KC doesn't indicate whether the matter was inappropriate because we don't know what the mattee was.
What is a fair inference?
223
126
I saw three queries go sailing by, go sailing by, go sailing by;
I saw three queries go sailing by on Christmas Day in the morning.
And then I reassessed my life and wondered how I could make it less empty and lonely in 2023.
237
133
I remember the allegations and investigation. The matter was considered sufficiently serious to instruct a KC.
247
125
False allegations of sexual harassment are very uncommon.
227
127
Anonymous 29 December 22 17:52: and also an HR matter.
218
114
Question Man 30 December 22 08:20: brilliant! Question Man is such a weirdo.
135
234
@29 @20.20 - no, the allegations were at Travers Smith, not Ashurst. Your false allegation that there were allegations at Ashurst is an example of false allegations relating to sex, which are very common.
224
133
Anon 26 December 22 14:39: Question Man is not ok. Far from it. He is seriously mentally ill.
135
234
@ 30th @ 8.20 - we like the questions. They're pertinent, you have no answers to them, and they've got you singing.
119
237
@30th @ 9.29 - you won't remember the incident as there was no incident at Ashurst.
We don't know if the conduct at Travers Smith was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
The fact they brought in a KC and that he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
Your false allegations that there were allegations at Ashurst and that the allegations were serious are examples of false allegations relating to sex, which are very common.
238
138
I remember the allegations well.
240
117
The fact they brought in a KC and that he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
The fact they brought in a KC and that he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
The fact they brought in a KC and that he was dismissed doesn't indicate whether the conduct was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was.
The fact they brought in a KC doesn't indicate whether the matter was inappropriate because we don't know what the mattee was.
If I repeat this enough times, it will become true.
132
236
@31 @8.02 - no, false allegations are very common, as shown by your comments.
127
210
@31st December @ 12.06 - only if the person accused has been investigated by the police, charged and convicted. Otherwise it is not an HR matter.
129
226
Question Man 31 December 22 12:09: seeing as you are Question Man 30 December 22 08:20 commenting on your own comment it seems that such a weirdo is you!
126
232
@ 31 @ 19:03 - not ok in what way? Far from what? What illness?
130
223
Can't see that the Clyde's partner did anything worthy of regulatory censure. The way it was dealt with meant he ended up a victim.
137
221
The Orrick allegations turned out not to be true.
135
233
S&G new “technical” director has an Aaron fetish - only promoting people with that name last year, expect to see the rest of the IT team let go unless they change their name by deed poll
249
137
It’s obvious that the person against whom these sex related allegations were made is posting like mad to try and protect their position and/or change the historical record
168
108
What the Clyde's partner did was worthy of regulatory censure. He was not a victim. The Orrick allegations turned out to be true.
172
105
Anon 31 December 22 12:06: yes - obviously an HR matter.
181
101
Question Man out in force here. What a strange bloke. Let’s hope he gets help in 2023 so we can be spared his nonsense.
169
114
Anon 23 December 22 10:42: correct.
104
177
@1st @10.39 - you don't remember the allegations at Ashurst Well as there were no allegations at Ashurst!
@1st @10.45 - it was alrwady true the first time it was said! What does the 'mattee' mean?!
@[email protected] - what comments? what sex related allegations? what position? what historical record? Obvious to who?!
180
104
Everyone in the Universe 01 January 23 22:22: please get help, Question Man. I hope 2023 might be the year when things begin to improve for you - but the starting point is seeing a mental health professional.
86
188
A top partner at a major UK law firm was investigated and found not to have done anything wrong. This is not surprising given the high incidence of false accusations relating to 'sexual harassment'.
106
184
The historical record is that Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
102
198
@Obvious - Excuse me, if it's me you're talking about then I'll have you know that I have been cleared of all wrongdoing by the BSB.
The historical record is very clear about that. No changes required.
119
172
@[email protected] - the Clyde's partner didn't do anything worthy of regulatory censure, indeed it is obvious the regulators thought so too. The Orrick allegations ruined out to be untrue - Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
@[email protected] - obviously not an HR matter. Criminal allegations are for the police, not HR.
@[email protected] - what nonsense?
178
101
A top partner at a major UK law firm was investigated and found to have behaved inappropriately. This is not surprising given the low incidence of false accusations relating to sexual harassment.
176
119
The historical record is that Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found that the groping took place.
181
105
@Obvious - Excuse me, if it's me you're talking about then I'll have you know that I was found to have sexually harassed a woman. And that finding was never impugned on appeal or by any other body.
The historical record is very clear about that. No changes required.
160
107
Anon 02 January 23 20:29: spot on.
170
99
Fortunately, false allegations are very uncommon in relation to sexual harassment.
103
180
Anon 02 January 23 21:41 - incorrect.
We know the conduct of the associate at Ashurst wasn't inappropriate or serious because the allegations were against an associate at Travers Smith. Since there were no allegations against an associate at Ashurst there was no KC brought in by Ashurst.
We don't know if the conduct of the associate at Travers Smith was inappropriate because we don't know what the conduct was. We know it wasn't serious because they brought in a KC.
100
169
@[email protected] - sounds like the one needing help is you! In how to answer questions!
103
183
Its clear from the comments that false accusations are very common when it comes to sexual harassment.
114
164
3rd Jan @ 22.31 - Boom!
95
185
There were no allegations about Ashurst.
187
102
Gathering the threads together, it is clear from the commentary and the voting that:
(i) Lord Lester was not cleared by the BSB or indeed at all.
(ii) False allegations of sexual harassment are uncommon.
(iii) Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found that the groping took place.
(iv) What the Clyde's partner did was worthy of regulatory censure. He was not a victim.
(v) The fact that Ashurst instructed a KC to investigate shows that the Ashurst associate’s conduct was inappropriate and serious, as does the fact that the associate was dismissed.
(vi) It was appropriate for the Lovells matter to be investigated by HR.
(vii) Question Man needs help from a mental health professional.
188
114
anon 09 January 23 11:10: that is the consensus, yes.
65
99
@11.10 - Yes yes, that's all grist for the mill, but what happened at Travers Smith?
111
65
anon 09 January 23 11:10 - agreed.
69
110
@[email protected] - what top partner was that? Certainly not any referred to in the article.
@11.13 - nah, the historical record is that Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found no evidence that the groping took place. Rof reported the allegations but not the outcome of Freshfields' investigation.
@11.16 - what was?
@11.18 - its clear from the comments that false accusations are very common when it comes to sexual harassment.
123
69
anon 09 January 23 11:10 - yes, the comments and voting clearly support that consensus.
114
62
The responses and voting show how throughly sick we are of Question Man’s nonsense. What an own goal for someone who presumably wants to be taken seriously.
114
62
@Anonymous 05 January 23 09:56 - it’s replies like that which show that Question Man is probably beyond help.
109
67
Lord Lester 03 January 23 22:31: please provide evidence that Lord Lester was cleared by the BSB.
90
66
@08.36 - please provide evidence that I am Lord Lester.
82
83
@[email protected] - no, you were completely cleared by the BSB. And the House of Lords voted that the process against you was unfair.
81
62
Anon 10 January 23 08:36: good luck with that - there isn't any!
69
79
@[email protected] - agreed,
Gathering the threads together, it is clear from the commentary and the voting that:
(i) Lord Lester was cleared by the BSB indeed.
(ii) False allegations of sexual harassment are common.
(iii) Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found that no groping took place.
(iv) What the Clyde's partner did wasnt worthy of regulatory censure. He ended up a victim.
(v) There were no allegations about Ashurst.
(vi) It was no appropriate for the Lovells matter to be investigated by HR as the allegations were of a criminal nature.
(vii) What mental health professional? What help?
85
69
Question Man - that ghastly apologist for Lord Lester and others who have committed misconduct - has well and truly been handed his backside on a plate with these comments and votes.
77
69
Anon 24 December 22 19:36 - sums it up perfectly.
78
66
anon 09 January 23 11:10: spot on.
72
81
Gathering the threads together, it is clear from the commentary and the voting that:
(i) Lord Lester was not cleared by the BSB or indeed at all.
(ii) False allegations of sexual harassment are uncommon.
(iii) Freshfields independently investigated the Orrick case and found that the groping took place.
(iv) What the Clyde's partner did was worthy of regulatory censure. He was not a victim.
(v) The fact that Ashurst instructed a KC to investigate shows that the Ashurst associate’s conduct was inappropriate and serious, as does the fact that the associate was dismissed.
(vi) It was appropriate for the Lovells matter to be investigated by HR.
(vii) Question Man needs help from a mental health professional.
78
68
Anonymous 10 January 23 12:22: The House of Lords in fact decided that the process was fair (see the decision of the Committee) and the BSB did not clear Lord Lester (having no power to do so).
68
88
Another week and I still just can't get to the bottom of this Lord Lester business. There are so many different accounts flying around.
People seem to be saying that he was cleared of all wrongdoing. Is that the right of it?
77
67
Anonymous 10 January 23 19:47: Question Man is so troubled.
74
74
@[email protected] - what is the consensus and who is 'yes'?
81
60
Anon 11 January 23 12:08: that is the consensus, yes.