Bullying? Give over. They have carte blanche to call Chimpy and everyone else a cunt and wish death on people who disagree, but if they get a little back then it's bullying? Open your other eye for a minute.
it's funny how me and hoolie happen to agree on quite a lot of stuff (weird, eh, being friends with someone you tend to agree with) but DO disagree on some things and the stuff we agree on is harmless
but strutter will back up really very nasty behaviour by men he probably would consider "beneath him" as friends but because they go to the pub now and then they, regretfully, must be included in the Zone of Mindless Backup
im not sure doing a thread search for "heh" to find every incidence of your fat girl in the playground style 'yeah what he said' for cookie and buzz, but I assure you countless examples have existed over many years. tragically
I guess the way it comes across, Strutter, is that you have a weird obsession with Clergs and Hoolie, and make odd little digs at them (either Clergs on her own or Clergs and Hoolie together), often in threads neither of them have even commented on. It's a bit odd.
But just to show that I am an equal opportunities piss taker I should also point out that I lampoon poor little hyoobert on a fairly regular basis too.
Far from being bullied Clergs’ rants are treated with far more respect here than they would be anywhere else I can think of, which is no doubt why she continues
0
1
Clergs/Hoolie with one stone, rather.
0
1
Now this is the law of the rof - as old and as true as the sky.
0
1
Or just enshrining bullying.
0
1
You should branch out a bit.
0
1
Bullying? Give over. They have carte blanche to call Chimpy and everyone else a cunt and wish death on people who disagree, but if they get a little back then it's bullying? Open your other eye for a minute.
0
1
I have never wished death on anyone you absolute loon. There are people who do it almost daily however.
0
0
Would you like to speak to the manager?
0
2
which of rof’s resident misogynists is rof royalty agin?
0
1
I see total deaths are almost at 50,000. Maybe Hoolie was talking in thousands? She should do the lottery this week.
0
1
it's funny how me and hoolie happen to agree on quite a lot of stuff (weird, eh, being friends with someone you tend to agree with) but DO disagree on some things and the stuff we agree on is harmless
but strutter will back up really very nasty behaviour by men he probably would consider "beneath him" as friends but because they go to the pub now and then they, regretfully, must be included in the Zone of Mindless Backup
I think this is what they call Darvo
just for a change
0
1
I’m sure we would all be delighted if you could provide an example my dear Diana
0
2
I cannot be fucked but you bev with some proper no-righters and validate their general tragiconduct as I am sure you are aware
I don't care what you do but it's properly pathetic that you try to insinuate others are guilty of your own actions
0
1
Although of course 2 or 3 would be better.
You know, to show a clear pattern.
0
1
Strutter was quite rightly just calling Hoolie out
0
1
Oh, so there are in fact no examples.
But it happened anyway.
In your head.
0
0
Love this phrase.
0
2
Strutter I'm sure you would find your existence more enjoyable if you just ignored us.
0
2
chz dux
0
1
Oh, so there are in fact no examples.
im not sure doing a thread search for "heh" to find every incidence of your fat girl in the playground style 'yeah what he said' for cookie and buzz, but I assure you countless examples have existed over many years. tragically
0
0
But linda how can I deny myself the fun of pulling apart the sort of baseless accusation that our dear Diana loves hurling around?
0
1
You're baseless
0
1
But you said ‘men I would consider beneath me’ - why would I hold that view of the individuals you mentioned?
0
0
What does that even mean linda?
0
1
It means you've had quite enough attention. Go and beg Phoebe to let you finger her or something. You're boring
0
1
Baseless doesn’t actually mean that though does it?
You just posted the first thing that came into your head and realised it was meaningless. Bit embarrassing really.
0
1
I guess the way it comes across, Strutter, is that you have a weird obsession with Clergs and Hoolie, and make odd little digs at them (either Clergs on her own or Clergs and Hoolie together), often in threads neither of them have even commented on. It's a bit odd.
0
1
Well a chap should have a hobby.
But just to show that I am an equal opportunities piss taker I should also point out that I lampoon poor little hyoobert on a fairly regular basis too.
0
1
Yeah but who doesn't?
0
1
You are as wise as you are beautiful.
0
2
Pretty sure struts was in the OBE once with me, Tecco, stix and clergy tbf
0
1
CLIQUE.
0
2
And others also Wang I seem to recall
0
2
Probably Jayers. People always overlook him
0
1
boom tisch
0
0
Strutter also lampoons Laz
0
1
Jayerz is fine.
0
0
Strutter generally lampoons everything. I don't think I've ever seen him in the flesh with a serious expression and no glint in his eye.
0
1
Did you mean that to sound quite so "hello sailor"?
0
3
Linda you are a wind up merchant
you derive pleasure from being a prat on here and then shouting at people when they take offence
like when you have called me names in the past when I have corrected you on gender equality matters.
0
1
The word 'lampoon' always reminds me of harpoons.
0
1
Puts me in mind of Chevy chase
0
0
Dux playing Mallet's Mallet here.
0
2
Far from being bullied Clergs’ rants are treated with far more respect here than they would be anywhere else I can think of, which is no doubt why she continues
0
1
Heh.
0
1
Yes Linda the innuendo was entirely intentional. I would hope it might have provoked a raised eyebrow or mirth from one or two individuals.
0
1
0
3
TL:DR but I assumed Strutter’s comment on the “RoF Thread” thread was a fine example of self parody.
Join the discussion