An applicant for a training contract at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain has been rejected for interview despite a 99th percentile score in the firm's assessment test.

The candidate submitted her application form to the firm and received an email from RPC saying they had read it "with interest" and she had been shortlisted for the next round: an assessment test. The candidate duly took the 30 minute verbal reasoning test and waited for the results.

However the firm told her it would not take her application to interview stage and so, assuming she had flunked the test, she asked for feedback. RPC told her that her score was in the top 1% of graduates who had taken the test and confirmed, just in case she might have been in doubt, "this is a high score". But still, it seemed, not enough to take her through to the next round.
 

 
Any wannabe trainees with aspirations to work at RPC better get practising their verbal reasoning as the firm clearly has very high standards.

A spokeswoman for the firm said: "we look for many qualities in our future Trainees and the verbal reasoning test only gives us a measure of one of them".

Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 12 October 12 08:46

What a non- story. Those verbal reasoning tests are stupidly easy- a bit of intelligence and practice should get you in the top 5% of the 'graduation population' without trouble.

Most firms take your test results and application as one- it is bot a 'pass to get through' stage. I don't find it strange that a top score in a simple comprehension exercise is not enough to overcome other deficiencies in the application.

Anonymous 12 October 12 10:42

Totally agree, this isn't exactly "news". Clever student doesn't get training contract. Feel for her but the competition for a training contract is huge - alot of other applicants got similar scores who probably had better applications

Anonymous 12 October 12 10:52

*** edit ***

alot of applicants would have got similar scores who probably had better applications

Anonymous 12 October 12 11:21

more concerned about the Key Stage One approach to commas demonstrated by RPC's HR representative

Anonymous 12 October 12 11:49

Lawyers need to be more than book smart to make clients happy. I doubt employers put that much weight on these sorts of tests, like someone else said, they are pretty easy.

Roll On Friday 12 October 12 11:59

Stop the press! Law firms are looking for people who are not just good at verbal reasoning... I don't know what to believe now!

Also, very much doubt that is actually the full or exact email HR will have sent out.

Anonymous 12 October 12 12:04

RPC's approach to recruitment is embarrassing to say the least. Clearly they liked this person's application form otherwise they wouldn't have invited them to take the test. It would appear however that the recruitment team are looking for a perfect score of 100% in order to progress to the next stage. Let me guess, next year RPC are only going to recruit from a specific blood group!? Utterly ridiculous!

Anonymous 12 October 12 12:33

Yeah, similar happened to me at both RPC and Eversheds... luckily the firm I wanted to work for thought differently! Fact is, they have too many applicants so it's not exactly surprising.

Anonymous 12 October 12 13:51


With a score that hight surely the candidate can do much better than a nondescript medium sized, mid-market, dreary open plan office firm.

Anonymous 12 October 12 15:35

anonymous above.

What is a hight score? I'm guessing you might not have made it to the next stage at this nondescript medium sized, mid-market, dreary open plan office firm either.