A number of law firms have been shopped this week for handing out summer scheme places to their own partners' friends and family.

Last week RollOnFriday revealed that Mishcon de Reya had given one highly prized vac scheme place to the son of one of its heads of departments - and another one to his best mate. But there have been similar shenanigans at DLA Piper, Fladgate and Weightmans.

At DLA's Liverpool office, a reader says that 12 students were taken on the scheme over June and July - one of whom is the son of a potential client and another the son of a former Head of Corporate at the firm. A spokesman said "all participants in our Summer Vacation Scheme formally applied, met the thresholds we set and after being fully assessed by our Graduate Recruitment Team, were offered places".

Reports that at Fladgate "partners' offspring are so abundant it sometimes feels as though everyone else is in the minority" seem a little wide of the mark, however. Chairman Charles Wander said "I've been looking for them all morning to say hello but discovered that only one out of our 17 work experience students this summer was a partner's offspring."

    Who's your daddy? 
 
And one has to admire the chutzpah of the son of a partner at Weightmans. He was accepted on its most recent two week scheme - apparently the second vac scheme he'd managed to land at the firm. But as he was on holiday for the first week he persuaded the firm to let him start late - and to stay on for a further week after everyone else had left. The firm wouldn't comment.
 
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 12 August 11 15:35

Nepotism is nothing new - life has always been about who you know as much as what you know. I've never had a leg up, but don't begrudge those who have..!

Besides, who is to say that those persons have not achieved placements on their own merits, in spite of rather than because of who they are? Does this mean that a connection with a firm should be a DISadvantage? How odd - I best get back in my cave then.

By the way, did anyone point out that one of the other DLA vac schemers was the son of a partner of a direct competitor? I'm sure there's something sinister in that for RoF to play with.

Anonymous 12 August 11 19:10

Definitely know someone who was taken on for a VS at DLA on the basis of family connections.

I personally think any connection should be wholly irrelevant - applications should be assessed objectively and fairly, and solely on the merits of the application in question.

ahvus 15 August 11 09:45

"of the mark"? Maybe the offspring of partners are better spellers than the rest?

Anonymous 15 August 11 17:27

Worked for a specialist corporate firm total staff of around 120. The only trainees and VS's were the partners/staff kids or kids of clients. I was one of three trainees out of the 12 who had actually managed to get a TC without first knowing anyone in the firm. None of this article therefore surprises me...

Anonymous 19 August 11 15:38

Eh, at the risk of offending those of you who have sucessfully dragged yourselves up from the gutter on your own merits, dont the Partners OWN their firms and are they not therefore entitled to hire who they bloody well please? it's not the civil service you know...... jeez its only a poxy VAC placement......

Anonymous 12 October 11 15:32

Hmmm. One in 17 of the work experience placements at Fladgate may be related, but how many associates? And while nepotism is nothing new, it used to be that when you got a job through a family tie you would have at least had the self-awareness to work harder, appear nicer and basically show everyone that you were grateful for the opportunity and deserved the role. This is most certainly not the case at Fladgate.