Let his be a lesson to cucked fans of oil clubs 'oh oh but davos our owners behaviour isn't anything to do with us' - cuck off, you cucks - get out there and make a difference. Power to the fans
Such a terrible process. Months of "deliberations" and preparations for him to come back all chucked out by a week's worth of social media. Right decision. Could have been made months if not years ago.
Doesn’t say he’s been sacked does it? I reckon he’ll continue to get paid during his contract to end June 2024 while he looks for a club who are happy to have a rapist as long as he’ll get them goals. Mid to top of the Championship I reckon.
He has been at the club since he was 7 and he is back together with and having a child with the person he assaulted. He is the club's responsibility, including his off field behaviour. Just binning him off would be punishing her as much as him.
If they were going to terminate his contract the would have done it when this all kicked off and he was arrested, dropped by sponsors and ghosted by all his team mates. They probably should have terminated his contract then, but they didn't so doing it now would be bizarre.
I am no fan of the management of Man Utd and the handling of this has been awful, but I don't see not sacking him now as a mistake. Help him find a new club and move on.
As I said, I’d have sacked him immediately at the time the video emerged for gross misconduct.
However they didn’t do so. Suggesting somehow terminating his contract with notice and full payment will somehow harm the woman he attempted to rape is laughable. If they’d sacked him with immediate effect in the first place maybe she’d have had less motivation to return to the wife beating rapey khvnt.
And the whole idea that United had anything at heart other than maintaining the value of an asset and not having to get humiliated in the transfer market again replacing them is laughable.
If I was a fan of Newcastle, citeh, PSG etc (and I thank the lord, George best, every day that I am notFAOD) I would be using this as an example of fan power
Next home game I am protesting, I am organising sit ins and walk outs and boycotts and all manner of things
They hadn't got back together and didn't have a new baby back then luv. I'm good but I'm not mystic meg. You keep swinging and missing in slow motion though.
We basically hold the same exact position on this. Should have binned him straight away, management have botched it at almost every turn and now shamed into the right thing (by the fans). You are so desperate for a scrap, but you're shit at it.
As an obvious aside, the way in which people are attracted to filthy lucre and will excuse literally any aspect of human behaviour in order to get or keep it is the best argument for Hell.
I’m absolutely loving the new moniker I’ve got being based on getting slushies for my family and someone else’s while on holiday. What a right cvnt eh? Lolz
He hasn’t been convicted of anything so I do not find it problematic that he is continuing his football career and would not find it so if he continued at Manchester United.
What? That the accusation of them alone is not sufficient to cost a man his career? I do not think that is why women do not report sexual offences, no.
Chinorder - a man who chooses to support a club entirely funded by human rights abuses and has never once critised them - talks more hot cock about the real club he is a obsessed with
The recording, with the photos, are as damning as you could imagine. I am very curious about the exculpatory evidence Murtough claims to have seen that led him to claim Greenwood is innocent. Hard to imagine what it might be and why, if it exists, they haven't produced it in the attempt to rehabilitate him.
It may be bollox RR. but if it isn’t bollox, there would still likely be zero value in putting it in the public domain. People aren’t likely to change their views.
Laz - many, many people (rightly) lose their jobs when not convicted in court. Just because it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law doesn’t mean they are suitable to be employed. He clearly falls into this category.
The man is scum and I would be overjoyed if he never worked or played football again.
He wouldn't be denied a livelihood for life. It's just a question of whether tens of thousands of people will pay for the privilege of watching him kick a ball about. That's a livelihood not many have. If people don't fancy it in his case because of what he's done, and he has to flip burgers or blozz docs for much less cash as a result, I don't see a problem with free market economics being allowed to take its course.
Anyway clearly the cow torturers are happy to turn a blind eye.
Laz - yes really. These are the sort of men that mean women are scared of all of us. Did you listen to the tape? I’d be very happy for him to live in poverty for the rest of his days.
Well, if the market is your only test then greenwood is going to be earning millions a year for the next fifteen years because many large clubs, especially overseas, will be willing to employ him. Let’s be clear thag the reason United are keen to move him on is not directly pecuniary; there would be no clear measurable financial downside for them in keeping him.
Also, let’s not forget that United have said, for whatever reason, that they don’t believe he did what he was charged with. If that’s true then it’s hard to see what grounds they would have for firing him (which is why they aren’t actually firing him).
Wtf. Of course it's pecuniary. They were going to try to weasel him back in slowly and then realised the utter shitshow it would lead to - fan protests, sit ins, boycotts etc - and how much money it would cost them.
If he gets someone to employ him then fine - Getafe won't be paying anything like the market rate they would have paid for him before this happened. But don't lets pretend he has some human right to highly remunerative work if people don't want to see him.
1
0
Got there in the end
Right decision, poor process
Let his be a lesson to cucked fans of oil clubs 'oh oh but davos our owners behaviour isn't anything to do with us' - cuck off, you cucks - get out there and make a difference. Power to the fans
1
0
Odd that his statement says he was cleared of the charges.
Rasmus must've been impressing in training last week
0
0
Such a terrible process. Months of "deliberations" and preparations for him to come back all chucked out by a week's worth of social media. Right decision. Could have been made months if not years ago.
Nigerian twitter is about to explode
0
0
Doesn’t say he’s been sacked does it? I reckon he’ll continue to get paid during his contract to end June 2024 while he looks for a club who are happy to have a rapist as long as he’ll get them goals. Mid to top of the Championship I reckon.
3
0
Hey risky I found your school photo. Sorry to be outy, but thought you would appreciate it.
0
0
Arteta on the phone to his agent as we speak
0
0
Newcastlol seems like the right fit tbf
0
0
Astounding that they are still managing to fook up so badly whilst reaching the right decision. Another awful statement. What a clusterfook.
0
0
Tell me you haven't watched greenwood without...
0
0
One of the big Italian clubs on loan or Saudi is what I'd guess
0
0
Yeah I have just actually read the statement (and the one from Greenwood) FFS
Also it does appear that he is going to stay on until they find someone to send him to (i.e. they're not just terminating his contract)
0
0
are they loaning him out or selling
0
0
Richard Arnold invetigates
0
0
He has been at the club since he was 7 and he is back together with and having a child with the person he assaulted. He is the club's responsibility, including his off field behaviour. Just binning him off would be punishing her as much as him.
If they were going to terminate his contract the would have done it when this all kicked off and he was arrested, dropped by sponsors and ghosted by all his team mates. They probably should have terminated his contract then, but they didn't so doing it now would be bizarre.
I am no fan of the management of Man Utd and the handling of this has been awful, but I don't see not sacking him now as a mistake. Help him find a new club and move on.
1
0
Yes, paying him several millions to terminate the contract as well as the millions paid for not doing anything would be terrible for her.
0
0
They could write a book about how woefully Man U manage to fvck almost everything up
0
0
You were bleating about gross misconduct the other day with no payoff so go have a slushy and wind your neck in.
0
0
As I said, I’d have sacked him immediately at the time the video emerged for gross misconduct.
However they didn’t do so. Suggesting somehow terminating his contract with notice and full payment will somehow harm the woman he attempted to rape is laughable. If they’d sacked him with immediate effect in the first place maybe she’d have had less motivation to return to the wife beating rapey khvnt.
And the whole idea that United had anything at heart other than maintaining the value of an asset and not having to get humiliated in the transfer market again replacing them is laughable.
0
0
That's also what I said they should have done. Sue, you're shouting at tea.
0
0
If I was a fan of Newcastle, citeh, PSG etc (and I thank the lord, George best, every day that I am notFAOD) I would be using this as an example of fan power
Next home game I am protesting, I am organising sit ins and walk outs and boycotts and all manner of things
I'm not just sitting there like a cuck
Guess united means more
We stand alone. Again.
0
0
If that’s what you think they should have done then, how does doing that now punish her as much as him?
0
0
It really is a cult
0
0
They hadn't got back together and didn't have a new baby back then luv. I'm good but I'm not mystic meg. You keep swinging and missing in slow motion though.
0
0
We basically hold the same exact position on this. Should have binned him straight away, management have botched it at almost every turn and now shamed into the right thing (by the fans). You are so desperate for a scrap, but you're shit at it.
0
0
What difference does that make you oddball?
She’ll be OK for money now, less so then.
0
0
Keep at it scrappy
0
0
I think the point was that if they'd separated her financial position would (in theory) be unaffected by the sacking.
if they're a family unit that's obviously not the case.
just an explanation, I don't think it should have been factored into any decision by United
0
0
Adam Wagner v good on this.
0
0
As an obvious aside, the way in which people are attracted to filthy lucre and will excuse literally any aspect of human behaviour in order to get or keep it is the best argument for Hell.
0
0
And that there is evil a la letby
0
0
they would have no basis whatsoever to terminate his contract, as things stand
he will go on loan overseas where he will be less toxic and where the local fans are all massive fascist misogynists anyway. So, Juventus yeah
0
0
Not sure I agree on their being no basis (albeit I haven't looked at the standard premier league contract).
He wasn't found innocent.
0
0
Feck, I tried to abort before their was any chance of me misusing they're
0
0
but, as the club has publicly said, they don’t believe he did what he was accused of
0
0
I mean, it’s right there in the audio.
Utter wrong ‘un.
He should be in gaol.
0
0
Interesting. You’ve seen his contract then?
1
0
0
0
Look who's back and now he wants a piece of Laz!
Slushy Doo!
1
0
I’m absolutely loving the new moniker I’ve got being based on getting slushies for my family and someone else’s while on holiday. What a right cvnt eh? Lolz
0
0
Don’t worry, dux will be a long to defend him very shortly.
0
0
Roma briefing they’ll have him
0
0
As someone said above, Wagner is excellent on this. And kudos to the athletic too.
The weasel words in Manure and Greenwood’s statements are shameful. ‘Cleared of all charges’.
They can’t even get doing the right thing right.
0
0
Wonder how RR’s pitch to be Lady Lineker will work out?
0
0
Everton desperately need a forward and soon it may be the case of 'anyone will do'!
0
0
United fans stand alone in defence of football
Cucked by our club? Never. It means more to us than anything
0
0
Marina Hyde nailing it as per in the Graun.
0
0
doesn't look like he's going to get a move anywhere at this rate
0
0
He's gone. Thank fück.
0
0
Loan only. The Spanish FA want to make sure his past actions weren't a blip in character before they sanction a full transfer.
0
0
I feel sympathy for some poor sod who does PR for the Spanish FA. This is exactly what they need right now.
0
0
Quite a good way to distract from the current fiasco but starting a new one
0
0
lol
0
0
Mason Greenwood: Getafe manager says club will help forward find 'best level' https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66698653
‘best level’
lol at the unconvicted footie thug
0
0
He's a khunt
But his football ability is undoubted
0
0
So fvcking what?
0
0
Work Experience is a qualified banker
0
0
Fun Sponge has a job
0
0
Fvcking Suella is a member of the Bar
0
0
0
0
Note they didn’t release him or sell him. Gone out on loan, so they clearly hope to reintegrate him next season.
0
0
He hasn’t been convicted of anything so I do not find it problematic that he is continuing his football career and would not find it so if he continued at Manchester United.
2
0
THIS
IS
WHY
WOMEN
DO
NOT
REPORT
SEXUAL
OFFENCES
FFFFFFS
1
0
What? That the accusation of them alone is not sufficient to cost a man his career? I do not think that is why women do not report sexual offences, no.
1
0
Chinorder - a man who chooses to support a club entirely funded by human rights abuses and has never once critised them - talks more hot cock about the real club he is a obsessed with
Hated. Adored. Never ignored.
1
0
"would not find it so if he continued at Manchester United."
Laz you support Saudis lad so your opinion is invalid
United fans (real working class lads who support human rights) have made it impossible for him to return
Let that be a lesson for you oil club 'fans'
0
0
Wot Rog said. This sleazebag has got off scot free
0
0
Footie is rotten from top to bottom
1
0
“What? That the accusation of them alone is not sufficient to cost a man his career?”
You must have missed the recordings. Not just an accusation alone but damning corroborative evidence.
0
0
The recording, with the photos, are as damning as you could imagine. I am very curious about the exculpatory evidence Murtough claims to have seen that led him to claim Greenwood is innocent. Hard to imagine what it might be and why, if it exists, they haven't produced it in the attempt to rehabilitate him.
It's bollocks isn't it?
0
0
He has not been convicted, Jim. The only tribunal got to judge evidence is the Court.
0
0
Most of what murtough says is absolutely hot cock tbf tbf
0
0
It may be bollox RR. but if it isn’t bollox, there would still likely be zero value in putting it in the public domain. People aren’t likely to change their views.
3
0
Laz - many, many people (rightly) lose their jobs when not convicted in court. Just because it has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law doesn’t mean they are suitable to be employed. He clearly falls into this category.
The man is scum and I would be overjoyed if he never worked or played football again.
0
0
really? even assuming he’d been tried and convicted, you think the penalty should be to be denied a livelihood for life? give over fgs
0
0
He wouldn't be denied a livelihood for life. It's just a question of whether tens of thousands of people will pay for the privilege of watching him kick a ball about. That's a livelihood not many have. If people don't fancy it in his case because of what he's done, and he has to flip burgers or blozz docs for much less cash as a result, I don't see a problem with free market economics being allowed to take its course.
Anyway clearly the cow torturers are happy to turn a blind eye.
0
0
Laz - yes really. These are the sort of men that mean women are scared of all of us. Did you listen to the tape? I’d be very happy for him to live in poverty for the rest of his days.
0
0
Well, if the market is your only test then greenwood is going to be earning millions a year for the next fifteen years because many large clubs, especially overseas, will be willing to employ him. Let’s be clear thag the reason United are keen to move him on is not directly pecuniary; there would be no clear measurable financial downside for them in keeping him.
0
0
Of course I didn’t listen to the tape. I’m not on a jury, and for that matter he’s not being tried
0
0
Also, let’s not forget that United have said, for whatever reason, that they don’t believe he did what he was charged with. If that’s true then it’s hard to see what grounds they would have for firing him (which is why they aren’t actually firing him).
0
0
He should be in gaol
0
0
I refer you to Roger’s 11:04.
0
0
Wtf. Of course it's pecuniary. They were going to try to weasel him back in slowly and then realised the utter shitshow it would lead to - fan protests, sit ins, boycotts etc - and how much money it would cost them.
If he gets someone to employ him then fine - Getafe won't be paying anything like the market rate they would have paid for him before this happened. But don't lets pretend he has some human right to highly remunerative work if people don't want to see him.
0
0
good point, but since nobody was claiming he has a human right to blah blah blah in the first place, kind of besides the point
0
0
No, you seemed to think that if he couldn't play football that would be denying him a livelihood.
1
0
nope that was in your head
Inam not in favour of lobbying to exclude him from the game, but nobody is obliged to pay him and I haven’t said they should be
0
0
The man is scum and I would be overjoyed if he never worked or played football again.
0
Vote up!
Sir Woke XR Remainer FBPE MBE03 Sep 23 14:22
Reply|
Report
really? even assuming he’d been tried and convicted, you think the penalty should be to be denied a livelihood for life?
0
0
do u imagine u have laid devastating waste to some argument i made; there
0
0
No I just realised after I posted it that I misread it actually.
But you carry on with your fevered imaginings.
Join the discussion