Someone (probably Jolyon Maugham) will JR that on the basis that the "meaningful vote" was a condition of parliament agreeing to trigger Article 50, and they will almost certainly win.
I'd also like to see someone refer that to the CJEU and ask them to rule retrospectively that Article 50 wasn't triggered in accordance with the UK's consitutional requirements because it was subject to a condition that has now not been fulfilled. That would be lolsome.
0
0
They'll put through mays deal without a vote
0
0
Without a parliamentary vote? Not possible
0
0
Someone (probably Jolyon Maugham) will JR that on the basis that the "meaningful vote" was a condition of parliament agreeing to trigger Article 50, and they will almost certainly win.
I'd also like to see someone refer that to the CJEU and ask them to rule retrospectively that Article 50 wasn't triggered in accordance with the UK's consitutional requirements because it was subject to a condition that has now not been fulfilled. That would be lolsome.
0
0
The meaningful vote only has to happen before 29 March. Including on 29 March.
Revocation can be done unilaterally, but really without a 2nd referendum? Don't think so.
May's deal isn't getting through.
Extension has to be unilaterally approved by EU27, it isn't going to happen.
0
0
You are wronger than a wrong thing. Zzzzzzz.
0
0
But they need us more than we need them ((c) every Brexiteer, 2016-18).
0
0
(c) every Brexiteer apart from me
They aren't going to approve an extension
Our Parliament won't even be able to pass 2nd ref legislation FFS
0
0
I see hard Brexit on 29/3 or an extension (which the EU will happily agree to avoid chaos) as the most likely alternatives.
0
0
At least we now know which politicians are idiots who don’t read their brief.
Join the discussion