The standard seems to have got YOY much, much worse to the appointment of embrasement. Why don't the producers choose high performer bankers, strat consultants,hedge funder managers, corporate lawyers, big 4 ACA's , entrepenuers , MC/SC corporate lawyers, etc, etc?
Search RollOnFriday
0
0
They did that for the first two series and it attracted much the same audience as Dragons' Den but picking a bunch of no hoper idiots who make great entertainment justifies a prime time slot year after year.
0
0
Sails yeah I do remember now I guess this format makes for “better “ TV , these though are the worst ever .
0
0
Why the distinction between "corporate lawyers" and "MC/SC corporate lawyers"? Maybe you should add "US corporate lawyers", "FULL NY W/S CORPORATE LAWYERS", "Bronze Medallion corporate lawyers", "Non NY W/S but still Amlaw 100 corporate lawyers" and "mid-atlantic corporate lawyers" as categories in the interests of inclusion?
0
0
Point well made Buzz, yes indeed .
0
0
Not West End corporate lawyers though. They're f*cking shyte
0
0
Nah Buzz you are wrong . West end corporate lawyers are the best , see Harper James solicitors who are 70% cheaper than large city corporate law firms . It is beyond me why Blackstone , KKR, Barclays et al continue to use the Latham’s , CC , Sidley Austin’s of this world when they could use Harper James and save dolla .
its the future mate , suck it up !?
0
0
Nowt as expensive as cheap legal advice.
0
0
Grant and buzz it was a joke
0
0
May be as simple as does a West End firm have enough PI cover to cover ballsing up a Blackrock mega deal?
Join the discussion