Good if hes a secularist - we need to keep the european trend of freeing ourselves from the tyranny of various sky-fairies going.
Not particularly anti-immigration but the fact that developing nations (bar the US) tend to be more religious per se (hence the very socially conservative attitudes) is a down-side to larger scale migration.
I like the economic and other cultural benefits however.
risky - matter of factor and degree - religion in more seculary countries has less of a hold so not quite as strong on topics such as FGM, persecution of homosexuals, classical patriarchal roles in the home versus work etc.
I am a bit more liberal than that - doesnt mean i am with the full on green-hair, nose-ring "i identify as a two-soul space vixen and a wednesday and friday" type, but at the same time i am quite happy with my wife have personal freedoms and the ability to progress at work, and that a gay person can be gay in realtive peace in the uk.
2
3
He can’t hear her if she’s not robed,
2
4
nobody cares, make madge 5000
1
5
Wow expected it from cookie, not you tho laz :(
2
2
Ffs. Some of you people need to study Debrett's Correct Form.
3
2
THEY’RE ALL AS BAD AS EACH OTHER!!!
MAY AS WELL VOTE CONSERVATIVE AGAIN!!!
2
2
He'll be lucky to get 50 seats in the election, eh readers?!
2
3
Ricky you flaunt your ignorance like the worst of rof. Properly mediocre.
0
2
You can if you want Tom, I won’t be
1
2
This one is a nothing burger.
0
1
Starmer won't do that. He's anti-Christian. London is more religious than Northern Ireland. Problems ahead.
2
1
Risky is in full panic mode. YLTSI
0
1
He would be the first atheist prime minister
2
1
Is he? Good lad. Where did you read this about him? He just gets better and better.
0
1
It’s always a negative when it comes to getting elected
0
2
Good if hes a secularist - we need to keep the european trend of freeing ourselves from the tyranny of various sky-fairies going.
Not particularly anti-immigration but the fact that developing nations (bar the US) tend to be more religious per se (hence the very socially conservative attitudes) is a down-side to larger scale migration.
I like the economic and other cultural benefits however.
0
1
Why do you dislike about the religious beliefs of immigrants?
0
1
Anti pope? Captain Sensible
0
1
risky - matter of factor and degree - religion in more seculary countries has less of a hold so not quite as strong on topics such as FGM, persecution of homosexuals, classical patriarchal roles in the home versus work etc.
I am a bit more liberal than that - doesnt mean i am with the full on green-hair, nose-ring "i identify as a two-soul space vixen and a wednesday and friday" type, but at the same time i am quite happy with my wife have personal freedoms and the ability to progress at work, and that a gay person can be gay in realtive peace in the uk.
0
1
Rob Cannon20 Mar 24 22:26
Starmer won't do that. He's anti-Christian.
_________________________________________________________________________
allowing toxic beliefs from the basket case that is the middle east to poison britain and the wider west is the worst mistake in history
we need to get back to teaching children to build wickermen in school and burning the king to bring back the sun
a little more human sacrifice and priestesses dancing round naked and this country/continent/culture would be great again
0
1
Do they threaten your lifestyle?
Join the discussion