Do you think these people consider how their "work" might be read in the future, or is it just fish-and-chip wrapping? What happened to serious journalism?
The trouble is no-one has faintest clue what Marina Hyde is on about half the time. I usually make to about the third line before my brain starts to hurt. Think I'll go for a lie down.
I ddint actually read to the end of her second article (why is it so long?) to be fair she herself refers to her earlier article and does a mea culpa. Fair enough.
Live by the word, die by the word, as the Bard of Ballsacks himself might observe, were he not holed up with whoever's accepted his instructions frantically trying to roll himself in glitter.
You lot are talking hot cock about MH, who is one of the best and also has quite admirably put her hands up on a personal failing that no-one would otherwise have remembered.
0
0
Burn her
2
0
Ooh that has aged like milk
0
0
Do you think these people consider how their "work" might be read in the future, or is it just fish-and-chip wrapping? What happened to serious journalism?
1
0
fish and chip.
another article, another cheque
0
0
She has written another article about it today: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/19/brave-victims-rus…
1
0
another cheque!
1
0
surey a candidate for the Private Eye Fancy That! column?
1
0
The trouble is no-one has faintest clue what Marina Hyde is on about half the time. I usually make to about the third line before my brain starts to hurt. Think I'll go for a lie down.
0
0
heh
0
0
This isn’t really about him, it’s more about Georgina.
1
0
I ddint actually read to the end of her second article (why is it so long?) to be fair she herself refers to her earlier article and does a mea culpa. Fair enough.
2
0
Not it's not really fair enough. These people, through nepotism, get jobs writing absolute shit. It's about time they were called out.
1
0
I mean fair enough on the topic of not being a hypocrite. Her writing is abysmal.
0
0
Rare agree with the Spectator.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/marina-hydes-russell-brand/
0
0
+1
The ‘naive cynicism’ of Russell Brand’s hasty defenders | The Spectator
2
0
Live by the word, die by the word, as the Bard of Ballsacks himself might observe, were he not holed up with whoever's accepted his instructions frantically trying to roll himself in glitter.
1
1
You lot are talking hot cock about MH, who is one of the best and also has quite admirably put her hands up on a personal failing that no-one would otherwise have remembered.
1
0
Someone literally posted it on RoF.
0
1
After reading about it because of her own article drawing attention to it, you absolute hmong.
0
0
The chain here is obvious:
MH writes column about her old column.
Cretin Steerpike writes column in Spectator about MH column about her old column.
Cretin and unpleasant far right agitator pftse4me reads Streerpike.
Cretin and bungler dux reads pfts4me.
1
0
she has a weird writing style that twists and turns rather being a logical progression - both articles are examples of it - I dont like it.
0
0
She is just an awful human being.
0
0
I quite like her.
0
0
Wtf?
0
0
What? She can be very funny
0
0
She's good. Very good.
0
0
wonder if she would go out with me
0
0
Didn't she boff Piers Morgan? Surely you have a chance if so.
0
0
Hmm, not sure I want to any more.
0
0
She's probably had a bath since.
Join the discussion