Just bossed my tax return

Clinical. 

Apparently HMRC  scrutinise more closely the  returns and affairs of higher earners if they do not submit them via a  reputable professional accountant/adviser.

Not  sure about a list, but probably a solid firm been going years is trusted  more than a glitzy new  outfit.

And HMRC deffo take a keener interest in folks who are constantly changing their accountants.

I’ve heard that too Marshall albeit from my accountant. I think notwithstanding the ‘well he would say that wouldn’t he’ ingredient there may be some truth in it. 

Often wonder how much scrutiny is actually applied as long as your job, investments and expenditure aren’t massively out of whack. Do they genuinely cross-check and triangulate between my various savings accounts paying me crappy levels of interest? 

There is something to all of this - any decent accountant will require evidence as to the client’s tax situation before signing off on the return, evidence of any deductions and reliefs being claimed etc.

Only caveat is that the bar for being deemed sufficiently HNW for anyone at HMRC to give a flying fvck about your specific tax return is probably mega mega - well above the level of a run of the mill partner at a city law firm, I’d think.