but that is probably not going to stop me howling with laughter when Nadine Dorries is the first person jailed under this for sending an ill advised tweet
Many TRAs (including "India" Willoughby) claim that sex isn't binary and that trans women have actually changed biological sex from male to female. They know that's false, and they've definitely caused more than non-trivial harm to others by doing so.
It's a batsh1t mental law, but could have people on both ends of the spectrum caught. Andrew Bridgen and Nadine Dorries on the one end and Owen Jones and Billy Bragg on the other. That would be hilarious if it wasn't so ridiculous.
Many TRAs (including "India" Willoughby) claim that sex isn't binary and that trans women have actually changed biological sex from male to female. They know that's false, and they've definitely caused more than non-trivial harm to others by doing so.
This is a lie, and a particularly retarded one. No-one seriously thinks any such thing, and even if they did no-one has been harmed by it.
Katie Montgomerie and India Willoughby have both said they have changed their biological sex.
You'll have to google yourself for the other screenshots and radio interviews they've done because they've blocked me on twotter, sensitive little sausages that they are.
Many TRAs (including "India" Willoughby) claim that sex isn't binary and that trans women have actually changed biological sex from male to female. They know that's false, and they've definitely caused more than non-trivial harm to others by doing so.
This is a lie, and a particularly retarded one.
I think it's quite shockingly ableist and non-inclusive word like "retarded", Warren, but if anyone on this thread comes across as retarded, I think most people can see it's you.
Would you like to apologise and admit you were wrong?
you know which online users should be locked up and have the key thrown away? people who sign a document with one signature ... which locks the doc so if you want to sign it you have to print the fvcker and sign it and scan it. for them, no punishment is too much
Question, could this affect normal business communications?
If you write a lie in an email to someone, intending to worry them into changing their position and doing a deal, is that significant psychological harm?
Most negotiations are made up of lies to some extent.
"if you write a lie in an email to someone, intending to worry them into changing their position and doing a deal, is that significant psychological harm"
Erm slight issue with code of conduct and misrepresentation laws
If you write a lie in an email to someone, intending to worry them into changing their position and doing a deal, is that significant psychological harm?
No, this law will only be used to prosecute people who are mean online to thin skinned Tory MPs and GBeebies hosts.
3
0
The malicious sending of false information with intent to harm people seems like a sensible thing to prohibit in 2023.
0
0
Can’t argue with that
0
0
This will not be misused at all.
1
0
it's an absolutely batshit law
this government can't pass anything, how is this completely demented bill somehow surviving
0
0
What pancakes said. Its total shite.
3
0
Rof Royalty20 Sep 23 12:43
This will not be misused at all.
_________________________________________
it's pretty awful
but that is probably not going to stop me howling with laughter when Nadine Dorries is the first person jailed under this for sending an ill advised tweet
0
0
Seems like an efficient way to send every Tory politica to the gaol tbf
0
0
*Politician
1
0
Well this is gonna kill RoF
0
0
Perhaps we can use the Russell Brand trivial man defence.
0
0
The Tories: police should tackle real crime not track people down for being mean online
Also the Tories: being mean online is now explicitly illegal
0
0
maybe add in economic damage for good measure
0
0
I think the correct spelling is Ho Lee Fukh.
0
0
So for example anti-vaccers are going to prison?
Well
There you go
Get jabbed kids
0
0
So no WhatsApp
Your private comms will be easy pickings for every hacker on the planet
And the government decides truth on pain of imprisonment
1
0
presumably they'd claim to have done their own research and therefore could easily demonstrate that they didn't know it to be false.
2
0
Fortunately the courts aren't busy and will have plenty of time to decide what that all means.
0
0
no whatsapp for people who set out to lie and thereby intend to cause non-trivial* harm
(*by the by it's good to see a PE buzzword to finally make it into the mainstream)
0
0
Transwomen are women
Transwomen are men
SEND HER DOWN
0
0
No, WhatsApp is going to pull out of the uk because of the de encryption requirements
0
0
Glad I don't need encryption to keep my life savings safe
O NO WAIT
2
0
"knows to be false"
This is really going to crack down on those anti-vaccers and alt right types who take advantage of vulnerable people on the internet for personal gain
Many Roffers have been cucked by such types
So I'm for it
1
0
’Transwomen are women
Transwomen are men
SEND HER DOWN‘
Why do middle aged social conservatives see everything through the prism of their weird obsession with trans folk?
0
0
I mean yeah that’s really the direction the government is moving to
0
0
Why do you pretend to be a moron? Or are you one?
1
0
Many TRAs (including "India" Willoughby) claim that sex isn't binary and that trans women have actually changed biological sex from male to female. They know that's false, and they've definitely caused more than non-trivial harm to others by doing so.
It's a batsh1t mental law, but could have people on both ends of the spectrum caught. Andrew Bridgen and Nadine Dorries on the one end and Owen Jones and Billy Bragg on the other. That would be hilarious if it wasn't so ridiculous.
0
0
Thing is tho do they know. How will the law accommodate the mad and the stupid?
0
0
Well India definitely knows because they were been given medical advice about what the surgery and drugs they were given would do.
0
0
Yeah but might genuinely be deluded. People r dumb
0
0
This is a lie, and a particularly retarded one. No-one seriously thinks any such thing, and even if they did no-one has been harmed by it.
0
0
Dawn Butler said children are born without a sex 🤣
0
0
1
0
0
0
Katie Montgomerie and India Willoughby have both said they have changed their biological sex.
You'll have to google yourself for the other screenshots and radio interviews they've done because they've blocked me on twotter, sensitive little sausages that they are.
1
0
I think it's quite shockingly ableist and non-inclusive word like "retarded", Warren, but if anyone on this thread comes across as retarded, I think most people can see it's you.
Would you like to apologise and admit you were wrong?
0
0
Sounds like warren is a bit terfy.
0
0
Genuine *chef's kiss* at paedo-supporting Peter Tatchell being called a TERF.
0
0
Warren is Peter Tatchell AICM lifetime membership of PIE.
1
0
It genuinely amazes me how little Warren bothers to look into these matters before posting his very strong manly opinions.
Then again, he didn't check whether the bloke he shagged was a bloke before he bent one up him, and that's why we are where we are.
0
0
Do you think they intend to criminalize unfaithful partners lying to their partners???
Kewl
1
0
tbf I think only ones who INTEND to cause upset with the lie
1
0
there are a few guys I know like Warren
they don't like women and they are uncomfortable thinking about women's bodies
mummy issues, I assume
0
0
Yeah I ve definitely seen intentional harm in the past especially in response to cheating (or suspected cheating)
1
0
Nobody voting gives a fvck about ‘trans issues’.
It’s the stupid economy.
0
0
you know which online users should be locked up and have the key thrown away? people who sign a document with one signature ... which locks the doc so if you want to sign it you have to print the fvcker and sign it and scan it. for them, no punishment is too much
0
0
Question, could this affect normal business communications?
If you write a lie in an email to someone, intending to worry them into changing their position and doing a deal, is that significant psychological harm?
Most negotiations are made up of lies to some extent.
0
0
Good point
0
0
MAIDSTONE
Now results in 10 years in the gaol
THEY ARE KNOCKING HOUSES DOWN
RESTRICTIONS WILL NEVER END
VACCINES ARE 5G
Clergs basically on for a life sentence
0
0
"if you write a lie in an email to someone, intending to worry them into changing their position and doing a deal, is that significant psychological harm"
Erm slight issue with code of conduct and misrepresentation laws
0
0
Davos, I wasn't thinking of solicitors. I was thinking of parties in general commercial negotiations.
0
0
Misrep rules still apply
0
0
yeah warren that is not ok
0
0
No, this law will only be used to prosecute people who are mean online to thin skinned Tory MPs and GBeebies hosts.
0
0
Yes, but will they now be caught by this legislation.
0
0
Do they define “cvnt”?
0
0
Yet his Ukraine war updates are top notch (other than the bits where he talks about Ukraine wanting to create its own empire essentially)
Join the discussion