the right honourable absolute throbber told them to go away and shut up.

does this make him "Sir" Gavin Williamson? If so, from what date?

christ almighty.  He completely fooked up in his stint as education secretary.  All of johnson's thick and useless appointees will be rewarded for the rest of their lives. 

and actively destructive, not just thick and useless (if only)

Triggered!

Pretty well automatic k if you serve in Cabinet. Even Ed Davey got one

no it's very much not automatic

Jesus, how much a a fooking useless aunt do you have to be to not get a K these days?

Ha ha, it cuz he has a black book (with naughty secrets) and a whip :-) The whip would turn most Tory MPs on, but not in Sir Gav of Williamsons hands.

Well I suppose its an orange book of Tory secrets.

Risky will be along soon and say this is all fine or Labour did worse.

Wasn’t he Johnson’s campaign manager? Reward for that I guess. And to help him keep quiet about what he saw as whip of course.

I think he Theresa may campaign manager. I may be wrong I often am.

He must have some hefty kompromat on Bodger.

Surely his only fans has a punch him in the face option?

Some of you will remember when roffers were similarly ennobled. By themselves. How we laughed. But there were no Gavs.

"Sir" Gavin Williamson to Chief Whip complaining he hadn't been invited to the Queen's funeral: 

R to C 15:59: “think very poor how PCs who arent favoured have been excluded from the funeral. Very poor and sends a very clear message”  

C to R 1601: “That is not the case…”  

R to C 16:02: “Well certainly looks it which think is very shit and perception becomes reality.”  

R to C 16:03: “Also don’t forget I know how this works so don’t puss me about”  

C to R 16:15: “As I said above – thats simply not the case …. The number of places allocated was extremely limited”  

R to C 16:21: “its very clear how you are going to treat a number of us which is very stupid and you are showing fook all interest in pulling things together. Don’t bother asking anything from me”  

R to C 16:22: “also this shows exactly how you have rigged it is is [sic] disgusting you are using her death to punish people who are just supportive, absolutely disgusting”  

C to R 16:47: “…, again, this is not the case whatsover”

R to C 17:01: “Well lets see how many more times you fook us all over. There is a price for everything”  

https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/mps-lords--offices/standards-and-financial-interests/independent-expert-panel/hc-1801---the-conduct-of-Sir-Gavin-Williamson-MP.pdf 

This is the party of, erm, who?

how do these people survive? In any normal job if you send messages like this to a colleague (or anyone else for that matter) you'd be out on your ear

Yes, well you may ask. Possibly it’s that a certain sort is attracted to “politics” precisely because it’s so indulged in this way. And once there it’s a private club. Absolute state. 

Gav thinks he's an attack dog. But in reality he's a mendacious chihuahua p1ssing and sh1tting on the carpet of life. Should have been drop kicked long ago but by whom? Let he who is without etc. All the better angels were expunged as not sufficiently slavvering at the thought of/desirous of endorsement by the Tufton St massif. 

what an absolute pikey, that turd, Gavin.

No wonder Dorries thought she should get it as well. 

2.24 Thirdly, and in essence a repeat of the first point, the Commissioner failed to take into consideration the tone of the language and the obscenities used. He accepted the respondent’s evidence that he meant “push” rather than “puss” in the text timed at 16:03 without giving reasons for doing so, ignoring the Independent Investigator’s record of the evidence that she had thought Sir Gavin meant “piss” rather than “puss”. In our opinion the determination of whether the respondent meant “piss” or “push” rather than “puss” has no material bearing on whether or not the respondent’s behaviour constituted an abuse or misuse of his power.

My favourite bit.

Out of the frying pan and back into the fireplace showroom

Someone else who's photographs make it look as though they are practising their 'serious' expression....

C to R 17:05: "do you already have a manger or would you like one for Christmas?"

He just looks so unpleasant. You wouldn’t give him the time of day would you. Keep stacking those shelves Gav

‘he meant “push” rather than “puss” in the text timed at 16:03 without giving reasons for doing so, ignoring the Independent Investigator’s record of the evidence that she had thought Sir Gavin meant “piss” rather than “puss”’

COOK PASS WILLIAMSON 

He’s just using salty language to express his frustration at being continually undermined and blocked by the blob. 

he's an arse and rude, but if the chief whip thinks that's being bullied by a backbencher, then WTF?

He’s just using salty language to express his frustration at being continually undermined and blocked by the blob

The blob being Liz Truss's chief whip ?

Just shoot him, do us all a favour. 

Or perhaps he’d like to be Work Experience‘s cape man in Vegas. 

Has anybody else pointed out that there seems to be a whip on his desk...?

him and hancock make me cringe so hard - embarrassing. 
 

surely one couldn’t feel bullied by such childishness?

Ffs. It’s the inequality of power. Look it up. As per with Rof a load of ppl kidding what they’d do. Nearly all would shit their pants and bow and scrape. 

The word oily comes to mind.