bother

Once you show interest you're in for it.


Insiders have accused National Accident Law of "harassing" potential clients in order to win their business.

NAL is a personal injury firm regulated by the SRA. It employs 6 solicitors and another 40 fee-earners, forming part of NAHL Group Plc.

NAHL’s last annual report made sobering reading for investors, disclosing that on revenues of £41.1m it had made a profit before tax of £600k.

The company blamed its difficulties in part on changes to working practices brought about by the pandemic. Remote and hybrid working “has contributed to fewer accidents occurring during travel time, in workplaces, surrounding shops and urban areas”, rued the report.

Civilians who did manage to buck the trend and spank into plate glass windows or tumble down open manholes represented a “Pipeline of value”, and the annual report emphasised the company’s intention to “grow the number of personal injury enquiries we process in our own consumer-focused law firm, National Accident Law”.

Insiders told ROF the requirement to “continue to optimise our processes to achieve the admission and settlement timescales in our planning assumptions” had led to directives that discomfited staff.

They were “requiring harassment of potential customers” said one, who explained that if an individual contacted the firm, service agents were required to call them three times a day “for 14 days straight before we can close the matter”.

The source said that NAH agents were also permitted to close a matter if the potential client was adamant that they didn’t want to proceed or had decided to instruct another firm, but “we had to try and convince them that they had to stay”. Failure to do so resulted in staff being “criticised for not pushing back” hard enough to keep them.

ROF has seen text conversations between staff discussing the tactics.

“They want us to call people 3x a day!!” said one, who stated that if they were in a customer’s shoes, “I would complain if they called me more than once every two days”.

“This 1000% feels like harassing”, wrote another NAH employee. “People are going to start logging the number as a nuisance caller and people are going to get immediate scam alerts when we call”.

“I don’t feel comfortable calling that many times a day”, said another NAH service agent. “It’s rude and annoying for people”.

A spokesperson for NAH told RollOnFriday “it is factually incorrect to state that service agents are required to call customers 3 times a day for 14 days in a row”.

RollOnFriday provided the firm with a copy of an internal email sent by a NAH Claims Submission Team Leader which appeared to contradict NAH's statement. It instructed staff “to call the matters at least 3 times a day, where possible. After 14 days, where we have attempted the Claimant a reasonable amount of time, we should then send a 7 day letter”.


order

Ah.


Upon receipt of the evidence, NAH went quiet for a while. Then its spokesperson replied, “When a potential customer asks NAH to call them back we do our best to get hold of them at a time that suits them and it may take us repeated attempts before we're able to speak with them. We believe our call schedule is appropriate and we regularly review our processes based on customer feedback. We are proud to have instigated industry efforts to stop nuisance calls through our Ethical Marketing Charter”.

An insider told ROF the 14 day timer reset if someone said they needed time to think whether to proceed with NAH. “So on day 13 if they said, ‘I need to discuss with my partner’, we’d keep chasing for another 2 weeks”.

The pressure placed on NAH employees to secure sign-ups, as well as the bonuses available to them as incentives, came to the fore in 2021 when the SRA barred two NAH paralegals from working in law firms after NAH caught them logging calls to clients which never happened.

While admitting she had been dishonest, one of the parlegals, who worked in NAH's Claims Prepration Team, said that she falsely recorded time “in order to increase her daily units and meet targets”.

Survey

Status message

Sorry, the survey is now closed. Thanks for trying! But you are too late. Why, why so late?

Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 24 November 23 09:22

Wow, yet another law firm the SRA should be closing down but has failed to do anything.
The SRA is an awful regulator. I know someone who went there after he repeatedly missed low billing targets. It explains why so little is achieved by the SRA.

Anonymous 24 November 23 09:46

6 solicitors and 40 non-solicitor fee-earners (i.e. paralegals) - there's no way there is any effective supervision going on at that firm.

Dollar Bill 24 November 23 13:25

What do you expect from a bunch of ambulance chasers?

Anonymous 24 November 23 15:08

Have you had an accident in the last six months that wasn't your fault?

Have you had an accident in the last six months that wasn't your fault?

Have you had an accident in the last six months that wasn't your fault?

Have you had an accident in the last six months that wasn't your fault?

Have you had an accident in the last six months that wasn't your fault?

Have you had an accident in the last six months that wasn't your fault?

... boss? Boss? The line's gone dead on me.

SandG 24 November 23 23:06

If you want awful examples contact Slater and Gordon!

Prags the honest 27 November 23 09:58

If only Prags of Axiom had taken such hard best toil !

I am desperate to work here. 30 November 23 23:04

They're making only a £600K profit on literally £40M of turnover. Their offices are in a business park in Kettering which is not exactly the most expensive real estate. 46 employees. Where on earth is the money going? The logical conclusion is that the 46 employees of this firm are all being paid extraordinarily high salaries by the benevolent owners of this visionary law firm. Or, alternatively, we'll be reading about this firm's failure in a few months.

Related News