The Personal Injury firm has a nasty fall
Lyons Davidson has posted a £6.7 million loss for the last financial year.
It follows a torrid few years financially for the firm, with a cumulative loss of nearly £15 million over the last five years, by RollOnFriday's calculations. In the latest financial statement, turnover fell from £27.8 million to £23.3 million. While cash at hand dropped from around £2.3m to £400k.
With most figures going south, one outlier was directors’ remuneration which was recorded as going up from around £630k to £656k; with the remuneration for the highest paid director increasing from around £182k to £195k.
However, the firm's managing director Mark Savill denied there had been actual increase for directors' pay. He told RollOnFriday: "The changes in the amounts in our statutory accounts are only as a result of moving payments from different group companies in to one business. There has been no increase during that period other than a small inflationary one in 2019, and the directors also took a 20% pay cut during 2020 as part of the business response to Covid."
Savill stated: "The Directors have had no other changes to our pay and have invested in our people by ensuring that the reviews that have taken place have been focused on our staff instead."
The firm appears to have been perenially unlucky. "Covid was a setback for us and saw a dramatic reduction in new instructions," said the managing partner, which "led to a 23% reduction in revenue that otherwise would have been received in the 2022 financial year".
Lyons Davidson has also been affected by Personal Injury reforms over the last few years, as the Civil Liability Act and whiplash reforms have restricted legal fees that can be recovered. Connected to woes in the PI market, Lyons Davidson showed "exceptional costs" of £3.1m in its statutory accounts, which included final monies due following the collapse of its joint venture with National Accident Helpline in 2020.
Savill commented that, in order for the firm to succeed, it would have to transform "from what was predominantly a personal injury firm to being a much more diverse business." Possibly holding a fig leaf over the recent results, he noted that the firm's Household Legal Expenses Division is "growing well."
The firm also blamed court waiting times for its shonky results. Savill said the delays had increased "considerably, in some cases over 50% longer than pre Covid, which has slowed final resolution of claims, particularly in our Injury and Recoveries Divisions."
Staffing levels at the firm dipped slightly, in the latest results, from 550 to 536 staff; although that's still a fairly sizeable workforce for a national firm, and not small fry.
Despite the difficult financial year, Savill had a positive outlook: “The business remains strong, with net current assets of £32m and long term growing contracts with our insurer partners." He was also optimistic for the future: "I’m pleased to say that we are back in profit for the final quarter of this year, with our forecasts for FY24 showing a profit and further growth into FY25".
Comments
19
1
I worked there back in the day.
Bernie dipped out at just the right time. Hope he still has his yacht.
15
0
It's been a sinking ship for years! They were barely keeping their heads above the water pre covid so I'm not surprised with this article.
18
1
"Savill had a positive outlook" - despite a £7m loss. Another few positive years like this and his outlook is about all that will be left.
19
1
Been on the cards for years. Just a carcass left for their insurance ‘business partners’ to finish off.
15
0
It would be interesting to see some stats comparing the collapse of ABS firms versus traditional partnerships. The business drivers and capital models are vastly different and it seems like most of the recent ones have been in the ABS camp.
19
0
I knew someone who worked there and would roll her eyeballs when anyone mentioned them.
19
1
Badly managed from the top down. Staff are just numbers. Salaries well below industry average and a mentality of not replacing staff and, instead, expecting others to absorb workloads.
Glad I got out.
18
0
If they need to generate another £7m in the next year just to break even, and have lost £15m over five years, and with costs going up and further issues in the PI market making conditions very difficult, there is only one way this is ending. Very very difficult to just create or grow new practice areas from a standing start without significant capital outlay to attract partners and teams. It's a salient example of a firm that put too many eggs in one basket, failed to diversify and is now looking very exposed.
I would imagine a number of the top earning / performing partners - sorry, directors - are already planning their exit strategy.
20
0
If Savill is taking comfort in the £32million in company assets, his bank shouldn’t. Of that, roughly £14 million is ‘goodwill’ which seems astoundingly high for such a consistently loss making business and nearly the same again of WIP - which is a long way from money in the bank in the PI fixed cost, conditional fee arena.
19
0
Surprised they are still in existence tbh. Shocking firm pre Covid, couldn’t seem to grasp the very basics of insurance such as repairs and incapable of forwarding documents in support of such claims.
16
1
About to go under
19
0
Will people still bash me for saying that anyone there should just take any job they can get in order to escape? They can find something better at their leisure once they're in their new chair. Because their current place is only going one way.
I said it a few times about AxiPlexInce and people seemed to think it was bad advice...
17
1
If only Axiom were around to buy them up...
18
1
How much they got in client account? Might be interested.
20
0
Worked there myself, hated it, left. Writing is on the wall.
17
2
Are they still paying paralegals £14k?