hey! guess what that article doesn't say.  

It doesn't say anything about a trans person, let alone a trans activist, spoke to the woman.

And I'm not so sure she's a "young girl".  I'd say young woman, tbh.  In her video, she also said she's supportive of inclusive changing rooms, just not keen on pervy men.

HTH

Hope you're not trying to condone 

 this bad behaviour Jelly 

The girl was severely traumatised 

I am not condoning it. It's horrible and traumatic.  You either cannot read, or are a deliberate liar.  Which is it, Hardrada?

She fell victim to two men sexually harassing her, not "be kind" (being kind, faod, is a good thing).

Jellymonster does try to be kind 

just trying to be accurate - is it that you can't read, or are you a liar.  Giving you the choice here!  Can't say kinder than that!

This was discussed very briefly towards the top of page 2 of the Allison Bailey thread

Are you going to bludgeon this to another 500 post cripplefight?  This was just to point out that the OP is full of shit or thick.  Or thick and full of shit, or full of thick shit.  

Jelly is right - there is nothing that says these men were transactivists. They are just the beneficiaries of transactivism - or more correctly, the TRAs.

Unnerving to see Jelly's stance on this 

u ok, hardo?  who hurt you?

Run jelly, the vampires are looking for a fresh victim.

I genuinely think it's not okay that some men harassed her that she feels unsafe.  I genuinely think it's a shitty thing to claim a trans rights activist harassed her.  HTH.  Not posting further, as do not have the energy to engage on this.  All of these threads are like a fight to the death between immortal beings.  

The OP (Tarquin's latest incarnation) is a liar, and a bigot and a general fool and approximately 98.2% of his posts should be ignored.  This is not news.

"Why do you think single sex spaces are being abandoned in favour of unisex spaces, Jelly?

At whose request?"

The answer to those questions have absolutely nothing to do with the fact that, as jellymonster pointed out, Tarquin was being his usual bigoted and provocative self with his post, and telling an actual lie (based on that article, at least), in claiming that this harassment was carried out by "trans activists".

There is more than enough evidence that the "work" of the TRA fanatics is damaging to everyone in general, and women in particular, without giving credence to made up sh1t - particularly when the person making sh1t up has demonstrated repeatedly that he equates women with household pets, and is only interested in women's rights if they allow him to flex his trolling muscles while being abusive about one minority or another.

Shops used to have single-sex fitting rooms? I don't ever remember that... although I never frequented Primark so maybe they did?

Quality of journalism: rock bottom

Following some links, came across a comment under a non-story about Holly Willoughby and Philip Schofield referring to the casket being in "...the Abbey..."

Of course it wasn't in the Abbey, it was in Westminster Hall.

Daily Express: newspapers for half-wits.

Right wing poster posts made up dog whistle culture war bollocks from right wing columnist of right wing ‘newspaper’ shock horror.

(FAOD before the useful idiots jump on this, the ‘made up’ bit refers to the spin of the ‘journalist’ not the incident itself, which I deplore).

Do you think the woman who posted the video is a liar?

i’d be a bit careful throwing rocks like that at cru anna

Eh?

Stripped down to its bare bones what this makes even more abundanty clear - along with the prisons and other stuff - is that the wokebroze of the board are perfectly satisfied with an increased risk of harm (including sexual harm) to women - either from men who self-identify as trans themselves or men generally - as a price worth paying for men who self-identify as trans having their feelz affirmed.

sorry anna - that didn’t make much sense you’re right

because cru was clearly calling the op a liar not the woman in the video and the “rock throwing” comment was because you posted less than a week ago:

I think many of the supposedly butch women who claim they've been challenged in women's toilets are just trans activists who are full of shit.

so glass houses etc

anna i don’t give a toss if you believe them or not

i’m pointing out the hypocrisy of your performative outrage - completely unjustified - towards cru for potentially not believing this woman’s story when less than a week ago you were proudly declaring that you don’t believe the stories of women who don’t support your agenda

I have to say it wouldn’t happen in Boden or Hobbs as the obvious distain of the staff would scare away anyone trying to squash themselves into ill fitting garments