I thought it might be a shit across the bows to Trump from the British government. Sort of ‘keep selling us down the river and we will embarrass you’ sort of thing. Had to sacrifice the diplomat but Trump has the message now - we have dirt on you. A bully only bullies the weak.
What do you mean Oakenshot was the leak? Is she part of the diplomatic service now? She was the reporter who wrote the story, the key question is who gave her the cables?
Unlikely to be Brexiteers because, let's be honest, you're not going to find a Brexiteer in the FCO, certainly not one with access to the U.S. Ambassador's missives. You will never find a more wretched hive of Europhile scum and villainy.
0
0
Unlikely to be brexiteers, they don't have many problems with Trump. More likely to be more Russian related de-stabilisation of the West
0
0
I thought it might be a shit across the bows to Trump from the British government. Sort of ‘keep selling us down the river and we will embarrass you’ sort of thing. Had to sacrifice the diplomat but Trump has the message now - we have dirt on you. A bully only bullies the weak.
0
0
“Shot across the bows”
0
0
Nah
0
0
Dreadful woman.
0
0
I wish I could bottle your genius DD.
I mean other than her name on the byline of the original article, what exactly was it that tipped you off to this amazing discovery?
0
0
What do you mean Oakenshot was the leak? Is she part of the diplomatic service now? She was the reporter who wrote the story, the key question is who gave her the cables?
0
0
No oakshot was the Journalist, but it’s a brexiter plot
0
0
Interested to know who leaked to her. Big troubles.
0
0
Christ
0
0
She and the Editor were bound by the Official Secrets Act and should be prosecuted
0
0
Oakenshot was not the leak you silly little aunt.
0
0
No but a brexiter was the leak
0
0
stop making stuff up.
0
0
Unlikely to be brexiteers, they don't have many problems with Trump. More likely to be more Russian related de-stabilisation of the West
Say that again Chambers, slowly...
0
0
Unlikely to be Brexiteers because, let's be honest, you're not going to find a Brexiteer in the FCO, certainly not one with access to the U.S. Ambassador's missives. You will never find a more wretched hive of Europhile scum and villainy.
0
0
Of course they're bound by the OSA
Get back to your goat herding
0
0
S 5 OSA 1989 innit. No public interest defence either
0
0
Jesus TF'ing christ, you lot.
Look, this is not difficult:
The leaking was A Bad Thing.
Bad Things are done by Bad People.
Brexiteers are very, very, VERY Bad People. The worst. Deeply evil and racist, all of them.
Ergo, the leak was done by Brexiteers.
Q.E.D.
0
0
I couldn't give a fook the motive of the person who did it, unless it's directly relevant to stopping further leaks. But they need fooking garroting.
0
0
"garroting" seems a bit extreeeme m7.
0
0
Well whatever's nearest that you're allowed these days
0
0
“Well whatever's nearest that you're allowed these days”
so a stern cuddle then?
Join the discussion