The hot priest in Fleabag

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/fleabag-andrew-scott-hot-priest-gay-man-lgbt-heart-throb-season-two-phoebe-wallerbridge-a8848031.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/0/fleabags-priest-isnt-sexy-abusing-position-power-swooning/

fook yeah, as in the Independent, or fook no as in the Telegraph?

(am definitely in the yes crowd, I’ve watched last week’s and today’s episodes twice already this morning)

 

It’s all very Thorn Birds except the priest is actually hot

(actually Richard Chamberlain is gay too)

i haven’t had such a crush on a tv character since Jamie Fraser

I am with the Telegraph. It's awful, he overstepped the mark and I think it's demonstrative of the fact that nearly all of her relationships are broken in some way and the good one she had, she destroyed. I really like the character but she doesn't half self-sabotage in a major way.

What cookie said.  Of course he 'overstepped the mark'. The character is a catholic priest who got a non-catholic into the confessional then told her to get on her knees before nipping round to the other side to get off with her! 

The point is people are complicated and flawed and hurting (and quite often drunk) and all that jazz and it makes them somewhat abusive.  The more uncomfortable point is that we often find people behaving in a way that reflects them being complicated and flawed and hurting (and somewhat abusive?) sexy. 

Incidentally while I am enjoying the new series there are two issues with it:

1. Fleabag is too consistently sympathetic this time around. The really interesting thing about the first series was how it made you like her and then reminded you what a truly fvcking awful person she was and then made you like her (or at least sympathize with her) again (I suspect PWB is just playing a slightly longer game this time). 

2. It's really not funny any more.  The first one was properly funny at times. This isn't. 

"The point is people are complicated and flawed and hurting (and quite often drunk) and all that jazz and it makes them somewhat abusive."

No. This is rationalisation of something that is not acceptable.

Ok I need to keep this a secret from my mum.

Strutter: you may mock but I had no idea (shows how innocent I was) that Freddie Mercury was gay until after his death.

One imagines the probabilities of your Mum getting the chance to come full-on to Richard Chamberlain only to be knocked back by him revealing he's flattered but actually really rather prefers the c0ck are pretty slim, Tec.

And contrary to wot strutter sed, change those boxers. They're disgusting, need a wash and will give you absolutely no chance for second knockings once Richard has blown out your Mum.

tbf as a young innocent in the 80s I had no idea about George Michael, or Boy George and Jon Moss until much later

i probably didn’t realise about Freddie at the time either 

Can I just say that I have now found a VPN service that works, and so I have finally caught up on the second series of Fleabag.m

it’s not as funny as it used to be. 

I also don’t get the hot vicar. It’s a short bloke in a dress?

 

I'm afraid we have some shocking news about Jimmy Somerville and Marc Almond for you too.

Have you seen what Marc has done to his face?!?! So awful. I do enjoy his version of Say Hello, Wave Goodbye, though.

The point is people are complicated

I think your explanation could have stopped here. People are complex and do stupid things. And that's basically the crux of Fleabag. I wonder how she's going to wrap this series up...

It’s both, I think- we see it from Fleabag’s perspective and for her it’s obviously sexy but it’s also exploitative. She’s destroyed by guilt and grief, he’s an alcoholic narcissist with no boundaries. Match made in heaven. 

Can't believe I am debating the ethics of characters from a comedy off of the telly but why is it exploitative of fleabag (by him) but not of him (by her). 

Interesting characterization of victim and exploiter...

heh @ wibble by the way.