Latham & Watkins may once again have taken the top spot for pay but it couldn't quite push Norton Rose off the podium.
The full results are set out in Inside Info. However the issues dominating this year's scores were how well firms handled the downturn and how well they treat their staff. And White and Case illustrates exactly how important these issues are - the firm may have come second for pay, but poor scores in these areas saw it drop down to just 41st on the table. Associates felt that when it came to handling redundancies, pay freezes and bonuses the firm, which has always been quite autonomous in London, suddenly seemed dominated by New York. One associate commented that "there was no room for flexibility on pay or bonus".
Meanwhile Hammonds appeared to come back from the dead to make third place overall. The firm, which has in the past been plagued with everything from financial difficulties to shoe fetishists, received glowing praise for its treatment of staff and came top of the class for promoting its talent.
Whilst US firms still score best for pay, the inclusion of Pinsent Masons in the top four shows that associates also value a firm that pays a fair wage for reasonable hours. With a respectable 73% score for pay, associates commented on the "value culture" of the firm and that it "paid well in comparison to similar firms".
Wragge once again crushed lesser firm biscuits underneath it (Wragges PR, you know where to send the freebies) - and Norton Rose's toilets "live up to the hype. They're amazing!"
Meanwhile while Hammonds came top for its parties, Ince & Co also scored highly for its "very, very, very delicious" canapes, as did Holman, Fenwick and Willan whose parties apparently end in "spit-roasting" which, respondents insist, is a good thing. Bringing up the rear is Eversheds... well it's not really a place with a party atmosphere at the moment.
See the full results on Inside Info.
Tip Off ROF
The full results are set out in Inside Info. However the issues dominating this year's scores were how well firms handled the downturn and how well they treat their staff. And White and Case illustrates exactly how important these issues are - the firm may have come second for pay, but poor scores in these areas saw it drop down to just 41st on the table. Associates felt that when it came to handling redundancies, pay freezes and bonuses the firm, which has always been quite autonomous in London, suddenly seemed dominated by New York. One associate commented that "there was no room for flexibility on pay or bonus".
Meanwhile Hammonds appeared to come back from the dead to make third place overall. The firm, which has in the past been plagued with everything from financial difficulties to shoe fetishists, received glowing praise for its treatment of staff and came top of the class for promoting its talent.
Whilst US firms still score best for pay, the inclusion of Pinsent Masons in the top four shows that associates also value a firm that pays a fair wage for reasonable hours. With a respectable 73% score for pay, associates commented on the "value culture" of the firm and that it "paid well in comparison to similar firms".
Wragge once again crushed lesser firm biscuits underneath it (Wragges PR, you know where to send the freebies) - and Norton Rose's toilets "live up to the hype. They're amazing!"
Meanwhile while Hammonds came top for its parties, Ince & Co also scored highly for its "very, very, very delicious" canapes, as did Holman, Fenwick and Willan whose parties apparently end in "spit-roasting" which, respondents insist, is a good thing. Bringing up the rear is Eversheds... well it's not really a place with a party atmosphere at the moment.
Winners | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pay | Prospects | Downturn | Treatment | Biscuits | Toilets | Parties | ||
1 | Latham & Watkins | Hammonds | Norton Rose | Norton Rose | Wragge | Norton Rose | Hammonds | |
2 | Jones Day | RPC | Reynolds | Hammonds | Lovells | Clifford Chance | RPC | |
3 | White & Case | Latham & Watkins | Hammonds | Bird & Bird | Olswang | Reed Smith | Ince & Co | |
4 | Pinsent Masons | Trowers & Hamlins | Stephenson Harwood | RPC | Norton Rose | Lovells | HFW | |
5 | Linklaters | Norton Rose | Slaughter & May | Latham & Watkins | Osborne Clarke | Talor Wessing | Latham & Watkins |
Losers | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pay | Prospects | Downturn | Treatment | Buscuits | Toilets | Parties | |
48 | Talor Wessing | McGrigors | LG | BLG | Irwin Mitchell | Stephenson Harwood | Charles Russell |
59 | Dundas & Wilson | Irwin Mitchell | Travers Smith | White & Case | Denton Wilde Sapte | BLG | TLT |
50 | BLG | Eversheds | DLA | DLA | Baker & McKenzie | Travers Smith | Dundas & Wilson |
51 | Eversheds | LG | Eversheds | Eversheds | TLT | McGrigors | Shoosmiths |
52 | Irwin Mitchell | Shoosmiths | Shoosmiths | Shoosmiths | LG | Trowers & Hamlin | Eversheds |