Flashsale- Velcro wedding rings.

Marriage should just no longer be a thing if it is allowed to be this disposable.  Instant gratification society takes yet another step of decadence.

Honestly m7s im tempted to give it all up and just move to Saudi or Brunei.

If you are of the opinion that -anything- you could say or do would ever have any effect on me, either hastening or delaying, then you have not been paying attention.  I wouldn’t be so free to use the term “us” either, given that your online stock has been doing its very own highly accurate impersonation of David Caruso’s career recently.

hth

hth

2000s[edit]

Caruso returned to film with a supporting role as Russell Crowe's mercenary associate in Proof of Life (2000). In 2001, he had a lead role in the cult psychological horror film Session 9.

David Caruso as Horatio Caine, November 2004

In 2002, Caruso returned to television in his first successful role since NYPD Blue, starring as police lieutenant Horatio Caine in the CSI spin-off series CSI: Miami. He was the first actor in the franchise to appear as the same character on three of the four CSI programs. He was known for frequently using one-liners at the beginning of each episode. Many of these include him putting on his trademark sunglasses mid-sentence, then walking off-screen just as the main theme starts (finishing move). On an episode of the Late Show with David Letterman that aired on March 8, 2007, actor and comedian Jim Carrey professed to being a fan of the show and went on to do an impersonation of Caine, asking for an "intense close-up" from the camera, speaking in a raspy voice and putting on sunglasses. Caruso later said in an interview with CBS that he was impressed with the impersonation.[12]

In 2012, CSI: Miami was cancelled after 10 seasons;[13] Caruso was the only actor to appear in all 232 episodes of the series.

Velcro wedding rings sound like an excellent idea. Remove the risk of degloving injuries for a start 

I'll probably get my next one tattooed on tho. That's twooo wuv 

It remains true actually, heh.  Thing is I was broken hearted and all that, but has she just gone for a no faults thing after two years separation I would probably have gone along with it. 

However she made up so many genuinely hurtful lies in her nonsense “unreasonable behaviour” petition, presumably egged in by her lawyer and new beau but still.  I just didn’t want that going down as having been something I did, because it was simply untrue.

Reality is that I’m sure some of my actual behaviour could have been considered unreasonable enough - I had a lot of charity commitments in Cornwall so we didn’t go on holiday often because I needed to get down here regularly, for example.  And if she had used some of those, I wouldn’t have had any room to weasel out of it.  But lies, no, I wasn’t down for that.

I presume she shall petition for divorce within one month and two days (to be specific!) based on five year separation.  

Shame really.

And yes hoolie - good shout that’s proper twoo.  Very jelly. :) 

Hmmm no, I was doing the “family charity shit that I should have told to get knotted and taken my wife on nice holidays instead of traipsing down to the SW all the time” unreasonable 

Marriage should be like passport renewal. Every decade or two revisit and renew if it’s right. People change and sometimes two people are no longer compatible. It’s not a blame apportioning exercise. It’s reality. 

That’s actually a great idea but isn’t new as it happens.

Time limited marriage contracts exist in a few religions, it’s one of the areas of Islam that most don’t know about.

For anyone interested it’s known as Nikah mut’ah, it’s more popular in Brunei than in many other Muslim countries.

 

It was something a mate and I discussed a year or so ago. You have to renew all sorts of important stuff as years go by. Why not marriage? It would give the respective spouses a chance to reflect and, in good cases, enjoy the maturing relationship and all that had occurred within it. In cases to the contrary, the opportunity for two adults to discuss without blame the best way forward. Where kids are involved it takes some of the horror out of the issue too. 

However she made up so many genuinely hurtful lies in her nonsense “unreasonable behaviour” petition, presumably egged in by her lawyer and new beau but still.  I just didn’t want that going down as having been something I did, because it was simply untrue.

 

Given your mental health issues, which have now been diagnosed and are being treated and which by your own admission seriously effect your understanding, behaviour and grasp on reality, how do you know that your wife's version of events in your marriage isn't the truth of things? 

Frankly after everything you've posted on here it's not easy to see you as the most reliable narrator of events.