Analysis of the Military Position In Ukraine - 24 January

Nicole Wolkov, Angelica Evans, Grace Mappes, Karolina Hird, George Barros, and Frederick W. Kagan

January 24, 2024, 8:20pm ET

Click here to see ISW’s interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This map is updated daily alongside the static maps present in this report.

Click here to see ISW’s 3D control of terrain topographic map of Ukraine. Use of a computer (not a mobile device) is strongly recommended for using this data-heavy tool.

Click here to access ISW’s archive of interactive time-lapse maps of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. These maps complement the static control-of-terrain map that ISW produces daily by showing a dynamic frontline. ISW will update this time-lapse map archive monthly.

Note: The data cut-off for this product was 1:30pm ET on January 24. ISW will cover subsequent reports in the January 25 Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment.

A Russian Il-76 military transport aircraft crashed in Belgorod Oblast on January 24. Geolocated footage posted by various Russian sources shows the Il-76 crashing in Yablonovo, Belgorod Oblast (about 50km northeast of Belgorod City).[1] The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) claimed that the Il-76 was carrying 65 Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) and was en route to a pre-arranged POW exchange at the Kolotylivka border-crossing checkpoint between Russia and Ukraine.[2] The Russian MoD accused Ukraine of hitting the plane with two unspecified missiles, killing the 65 POWs, six Russian crew members, and three Russian military personnel.[3] Senior Russian propagandist and Editor-in-Chief of state-controlled outlet RT Margarita Simonyan published a list of the names of the Ukrainian POWs supposedly on the flight, but several Russian and Ukrainian sources noted that at least one of the alleged POWs had already been exchanged in a previous POW swap on January 3.[4] Ukrainian officials, including Ukrainian Human Rights Commissioner Dmytro Lubinets and the Ukrainian Coordinating Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, immediately responded to the incident by emphasizing that Ukraine is investigating the crash and urged audiences not to draw premature conclusions about the crash based on unconfirmed reporting.[5] Ukrainian Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) Spokesperson Andriy Yusov confirmed that a POW exchange was scheduled to take place on January 24 but that the exchange was no longer taking place and that GUR is investigating the circumstances of the crash.[6] GUR later stated that Ukraine “does not have reliable and comprehensive information about who exactly was on board the plane.”[7] The Ukrainian General Staff did not directly respond to the incident but emphasized that Russia has conducted 19 missile strikes against Kharkiv Oblast from Belgorod Oblast over the past week and stressed that Ukraine “will continue to take measures to destroy means of delivery” and “control the airspace” in the Kharkiv-Belgorod border area.[8] Ukrainian outlet Ukrainska Pravda, citing unspecified sources in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, claimed that the Il-76 was transporting S-300 air-defense missiles, which Russian forces frequently use in strikes against ground targets in Kharkiv Oblast.[9] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated in his nightly address on January 24 that Ukraine is working to establish “all clear facts” and that GUR is looking into “the fate of all prisoners.” ISW offers no assessment of the circumstances of the Il-76 crash at this time and cannot independently verify Russian or Ukrainian statements on the incident.

Russian information space actors are seizing on the Il-76 crash to sow domestic discontent in Ukraine and undermine Western will to continue giving military support to Ukraine. Russian State Duma Defense Committee Chairperson Andrei Kartapolov claimed that Ukraine deliberately shot down the Il-76 knowing that it contained Ukrainian POWs and called for all POW exchanges to pause indefinitely.[10] Deputy Chairperson of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev accused Ukrainian “internal political struggles” of contributing to the crash.[11] Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who is currently in New York for UN Security Council (UNSC) meetings, called for an urgent UNSC meeting to address the crash and accused Ukraine of terrorism.[12] Such Russian accusations are meant in part to sow discontent in Ukraine and galvanize distrust of the Ukrainian government, which is consistent with several other Russian information efforts aimed at weakening Ukraine domestically.[13] POW exchanges are a sensitive issue in both Russia and Ukraine, and rhetorical invocations of POWs predictably elicit emotional responses. Russian officials additionally made unsubstantiated claims that Ukraine struck the Il-76 with US- or German-provided missile systems, likely in an attempt to discourage Ukraine’s Western partners from providing Ukraine with critical air defense systems necessary for Ukraine’s continued defense.[14]

Russian law enforcement authorities are codifying xenophobic profiling methods suggesting that migrants are predisposed to criminal activity against the backdrop of continued conflicts between Russian citizens and naturalized migrants. Russian outlet RTVI reported on January 24 that the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) published a “criminogenic index” detailing which countries’ migrants committed the most crimes in Russia in response to a request from Russian State Duma Deputy Mikhail Matveev to determine if “immigrants from certain countries have criminal characteristics.”[15] The MVD report found that crimes committed by migrants from “neighboring countries” declined between 2013 and 2019 but have increased since 2019.[16] The MVD report also found that citizens of Uzbekistan committed 40 percent of all crimes committed by foreigners from “neighboring countries” between January 2022 and May 2023. Uzbek citizens likely account for the highest percentage of crimes because there are more migrants from Uzbekistan in Russia than migrants from other Central Asian and South Caucasus countries.[17] Matveev stated that the MVD’s report excludes migrants with naturalized Russian citizenship, implying that migrants commit more crimes than reflected in the MVD’s official findings.[18] Russian Investigative Committee Head Alexander Bastrykin similarly claimed in September 2023 that the number of serious crimes that foreign citizens committed in Russia increased by 32 percent from 2022 to 2023.[19] Russian authorities’ deliberate attempts to highlight migrant crimes and portray migrants as a danger to Russian society are likely part of an ongoing effort to appease the pro-war Russian ultranationalist community that also routinely expresses xenophobia toward migrant and diaspora communities and to coerce migrants into Russian military service by limiting work opportunities in Russia.

Sakha Republic Head Aisen Nikolaev and other Russian sources claimed that unspecified foreign actors may have incited protests in Yakutsk, Sakha Republic, after a naturalized citizen from Tajikistan allegedly murdered a Russian citizen.[20] Nikolaev suggested that foreign agents may have encouraged these protests to incite conflict and divide Russian society.[21] Nikolaev instructed Sakha Republic authorities to monitor migrants and investigate the circumstances under which the murder suspect obtained Russian citizenship.[22] Nikolaev’s response of both condemning the protests as externally conceived and maintaining a harsh stance against a naturalized Russian citizen likely reflects the wider struggle Russian ultranationalists continue to face in attempting to portray non-ethnic Russian diaspora communities as an internal threat to Russian society while the Kremlin continues to portray Russia as a harmonious multiethnic society.

The Ukrainian Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) reported that Ukrainian hackers recently conducted cyberattacks on Russian intelligence and communications infrastructure. The GUR reported on January 24 that Ukrainian hackers conducted a successful cyberattack against the Russian “Planet” Scientific Research Center of Space Hydrometeorology's Far East branch, specifically targeting the center’s database, servers, and supercomputers.[23] The GUR reported that the attack destroyed a database that received and processed satellite data and contributed to products for over 50 Russian government agencies, including the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD), General Staff, and Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD). The GUR noted that the database contained two petabytes (two million gigabytes) of data potentially worth over $10 million. The GUR reported that the attack also rendered the center’s supercomputers inoperable and unable to be completely restored and brought down the center’s servers and physical infrastructure. The GUR stated that the attack will leave dozens of unspecified strategic defense companies without “critically important information” for a long time. The GUR reported on January 23 that unspecified “cyber volunteers” attacked Russian internet provider Akado-telecom, which services the Russian Presidential Administration, Federal Security Service (FSB), Federal Protective Service, Moscow Oblast governing bodies, Russian state-owned bank Sberbank, and others, causing a large-scale internet failure on January 21 and 22.[24]

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated during the 18th Ukraine Defense Contact Group at Ramstein Air Base in Germany that recent Russian missile strikes against Ukraine underscore the need to strengthen Ukraine’s air defenses. Stoltenberg noted on January 23 that NATO has already transferred a variety of air defense systems to Ukraine, including Patriots, IRIS-T, and NASAMS, and that NATO is supplying Ukraine with additional demining equipment, winter equipment, and fuel as part of its Comprehensive Assistance Package.[25] Ukrainian Ministry of Defense (MoD) Press and Information Department Head Illarion Pavlyuk stated that Ukrainian and Western officials discussed increasing the supply of long-range weapons to Ukraine, including adapting Western anti-aircraft missiles to Soviet-era launch platforms and expanding the production and supply of ammunition and artillery systems to Ukraine.[26] ISW previously assessed that Russian forces likely continue to experiment with new strike packages with different means of penetrating Ukrainian air defenses and to pressure Ukrainian air defense deployments following recent Ukrainian adaptations to prior Russian strike packages.[27] ISW continues to assess that Western provisions of air defense systems and missiles remain crucial in defending Ukraine‘s growing defense industrial base (DIB) against Russian strikes.[28]

Russian and Chadian officials met in Moscow on January 24, suggesting that Chad may be the Kremlin’s next target among former French colonies on the African continent. Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Chadian junta leader Mahamat Idriss Deby to discuss counterterrorism efforts in Chad and announced an upcoming agreement expanding Russian–Chadian cooperation.[29] Russian Deputy Defense Ministers Colonel General Alexander Fomin and Colonel General Yunus-Bek Yevkurov also met with Chadian Minister of the Armed Forces, Veterans Affairs, and War Victims Dago Yacouba to discuss bilateral military and military-technical cooperation and regional security.[30] Fomin and Yevkurov previously met with Nigerien National Defense Minister Major General Saliufou Modi.[31] ISW previously reported that Russia and the Central African Republic (CAR) are in negotiations to construct a Russian military base in CAR.[32] Russia appears to be attempting to expand its involvement with and influence on authoritarian regimes in western and central Africa, particularly focusing on former French colonies in the Sahel such as Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger.

The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) controlled Africa Corps published photos on January 24 claiming to show Africa Corps personnel arriving in Burkina Faso.[33] The Africa Corps claimed that 100 Russian personnel will perform executive protection and conduct counterterrorism operations in Burkina Faso and that another 200 personnel will arrive in the country in the near future.[34] ISW previously reported that the Kremlin is likely attempting to expand Russia’s influence in Africa through the Russian MoD and the MoD-controlled Africa Corps and assessed that the Kremlin is likely attempting to expand the Africa Corps’ operations in Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali.[35] The Kremlin may also eventually set conditions to expand the Africa Corps’ operations in Chad, given January 24 Russian–Chadian government meetings.

NATO announced on January 24 that the Steadfast Defender 2024 exercises have started and will run until May 31, 2024.[36] NATO reported that the exercises will occur in the High North, Central Europe, and Eastern Europe.[37] ISW continues to assess that Russia will attempt to misrepresent these exercises as a threat against Russia despite the exercises’ defensive nature in response to real Russian aggression against Ukraine and overt Russian threats to NATO states.[38]

Key Takeaways:

  • A Russian Il-76 military transport aircraft crashed in Belgorod Oblast on January 24.
  • Russian information space actors are seizing on the Il-76 crash to sow domestic discontent in Ukraine and undermine Western will to continue giving military support to Ukraine.
  • Russian law enforcement authorities are codifying xenophobic profiling methods suggesting that migrants are predisposed to criminal activity against the backdrop of continued conflicts between Russian citizens and naturalized migrants.
  • The Ukrainian Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) reported that Ukrainian hackers recently conducted cyberattacks on Russian intelligence and communications infrastructure.
  • NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated during the 18th Ukraine Defense Contact Group at Ramstein Air Base in Germany that recent Russian missile strikes against Ukraine underscore the need to strengthen Ukraine’s air defenses.
  • Russian and Chadian officials met in Moscow on January 24, suggesting that Chad may be the Kremlin’s next target among former French colonies on the African continent.
  • The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) controlled Africa Corps published photos on January 24 claiming to show Africa Corps personnel arriving in Burkina Faso.
  • NATO announced on January 24 that the Steadfast Defender 2024 exercises have started and will run until May 31, 2024.
  • Positional engagements continued throughout the theater.
  • Chechen Republic Head Ramzan Kadyrov continues efforts to bolster the reputation of Chechen forces.
  • Russian occupation authorities are setting conditions to coerce voter turnout in the upcoming March 2024 presidential elections.

https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-24-2024

Fairly quiet on the frontlines, with even Russia activity muted.  It's hard to tell exactly and varies from region to region but it must be at least 2-3 months since any significant Ukrainian offensive operations were conducted, apart from the small scale Dnipro crossings.  The question is, what have they been doing in this lull, and what do they have planned.

Russian Technological Adaptations (Russian objective: Introduce technological innovations to optimize systems for use in Ukraine)

Russia’s defense industrial base (DIB) continues attempting to adapt to Ukraine’s increased use of drones. Russian media reported on January 23 that Russia is completing tests of anti-drone “mini-missiles” that Russian forces will fire using modernized Pantsir-SM air defense systems to protect critical military assets against Ukrainian drone and quadcopter strikes.[68] The “mini-missiles” are reportedly much smaller than standard Pantsir missiles, allowing Russian forces to equip Pantsir-mounted combat vehicles with 48 of the smaller missiles as opposed to the typical 12 standard-sized missiles.[69]

Interesting titbit in the ISW report, illustrating the endless cycle of innovation, solution, innovation in warfare.  2024 may well be the year of the drone, both them and their inevitable countermeasures.

Militaryland is no longer going to be updating their maps due to the work involved (though this may pass on to another site).  Till then, I will keep attaching the last update as the maps are still useful, and the frontlines will probably stay similar for some time.

 

https://militaryland.net/news/invasion-day-665-summary/

The summary of the situation of Russian re-invasion to Ukraine covering the recent developments on the battlefield, as of 20th December 2023 – 22:00 (Kyiv time).

Summary of the day 665 is the last summary released this year. There might be an extra summary in case things worsen for the defenders in Avdiivka, but other than that, no other summary is planned for the upcoming Christmas holidays. I’d like to thank all our visitors for reading our summaries through the year 2023.

Sloboda Front

includes the area of between Oskil and Aydar river

Slo

  • Ukrainian forces drove Russian troops out of Synkivka, regaining control over the settlement. (source)
  • Russian troops advanced in the forest area north/north-west of Synkivka. (source)

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Synkivka, Petropavlivka, Ivanivka

Siverskyi Donets

overview map of Slovyansk, Kramatorsk, Bakhmut and Lysychansk vicinity

Siv

  • Ukrainian defenders repelled a Russian mechanized assault towards Spirne. (source)

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Terny, Bilohorivka, Spirne

Bakhmut Front

includes the vicinity of Bakhmut

Bak

  • The enemy gained full control over the Ukrainian fortified positions north-west of Bakhmut overlooking Khromove. (source)
  • Russian forces captured at least half of dacha area south-west of Bakhmut. (source)
  • Ukrainian forces advanced in the area of a water reservoir north of Andriivka. (source)
  • Russian troops captured a treeline north-west of Kurdyumivka. (source)

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Bohdanivka, Klishchiivka, Andriivka

Avdiivka Front

includes the vicinity of Avdiivka

AvD

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Novobakhmutivka, Stepove, Avdiivka, Sieverne, Pervomaiske, Nevelske

Avdiivka City

includes the city of Avdiivka

AvdC

  • Russian forces advanced by a one tree line from the direction of Vodyane towards Avdiivka. (source)

Donetsk Front

includes the center and southern part of Donetsk Oblast

Don

  • The enemy reached the southern edge of Novomykhailivka from the south. (source)

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Marinka, Pobieda, Novomykhailivka

Zaporizhzhia Front

includes the Zaporizhzhia Oblast

Zap

  • Russian forces regained previously lost positions east of Novoprokopivka. (source)

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Verbove, Robotyne

Left Bank Front

includes the left bank of Dnipro river between Kherson and Nova Kakhovka

LBF

  • Fighting continues in Krynky. Ukrainian marines continue to repel Russian attacks on the settlement.

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • No activity reported.

UK Ministry of Defence: https://www.facebook.com/theministryofdefence/ 

it must be at least 2-3 months since any significant Ukrainian offensive operations were conducted, apart from the small scale Dnipro crossings.  The question is, what have they been doing in this lull, and what do they have planned.

I am not sure if it is just blind optimisim on my part but my feeling is that Ukraine is up to something and keeping it quieter than the last offensive. 

I wonder if Steadfast Defender is in part designed to draw Russian attention. I wonder if they have been working on plans to more effectively tackle the mine fields and my gut feeling is that they have been using F-16s already. 

I think the Kherson bank is a distraction (they would take advantage if they could) but it is a very strong position where it is and draws the weak local russian forces into a killing field - breaking out from there would hand the advantage to the Russians. 

Guy Crouchback25 Jan 24 10:31

Is this the most half hearted war fought in modern times?

_______________________________________________________________________

no 

hundreds of thousands dead

the Russian blacksea flagship on the bottom of the sea

rampant fuel price inflation across the world 

the issue is more that Russia and Ukraine are better sutied to defensive warfare than offensive warfare (i.e. the US/Nato would have spent 6 weeks pounding the ever living shit out of the otherside with airstrikes and naval gunfire support before sending in a wave of tanks and AFVs under cover of gunships) 

 

Yeah I get all that but just think this is turning into an attritional conflict with absolute victory not really possible for either side.   Of course horrendous numbers have died but nothing compared to the carnage say in Vietnam, where a similar stalemate was reached before the US eventually gave up. 

Guy Crouchback25 Jan 24 10:57

Yeah I get all that but just think this is turning into an attritional conflict with absolute victory not really possible for either side.  

_________________________________________________________________________

in an attritional conflict Ukraine wins, because Ukraine is supported by the West and only taking Nato countries that amounts to dollar GDP economic advantage of 22 times (versus Russia and its backers Iran, Belarus, North Korea), taking purchase price parity it's more like 9 times but since Russia is fighting a war and needs components from the international market lets pick a number in the middle say 15 times. 

So to keep up with every dollar that Ukraine (and its supporters) spend on the War Russia has to spend 15 - there's no way it can sustain that level of spend to stay even never mind win. the downside is that it might be able to limp on for a couple more years but Russia is in a horrible position and a general mobilisation would be a big gamble, it might be able to feed, cloth, heat and equip more soldiers in the short term but long term it's a horrific money drain plus, the corruption and gouging 

Casualties on both sides have far exceeded US losses in Vietnam (which were about 58,000 dead, about 155,000 wounded or missing).  Russians are estimated to have over 300,000 killed/wounded (six times as much as in Afghanistan) while a US estimate for Ukrainian casualties in August last year was 70,000 killed and up to 120,000 wounded.  

The closest parallels appear to be WW1 trench warfare in large parts of the battlefront and the Rocket Blitz launched against London in 1944-1945, with big technological advancements (drones, precision artillery, guided missiles).  

Ukraine is supported by the West and only taking Nato countries that amounts to dollar GDP economic advantage of 22 times (versus Russia and its backers Iran, Belarus, North Korea), taking purchase price parity it's more like 9 times

That may be true - but Russia is taking the war a lot more seriously than the West.  Between that and the lack of political will in the West, the odds are a lot more evenly balanced between Russia and Ukraine than one might think (IMO anyway).  

PerfidiousPorpoise25 Jan 24 11:45

in an attritional conflict Ukraine wins, because Ukraine is supported by the West

Even if Trump wins?

__________________________________________________________________________________

Trump doesn't like Nato, I guess because he wants to make money in Russia and is sympathetic to them

bit of a question over whether Russia being totally in hock to China changes that, Trump is quite racist, even in the 80s he wasn't worried about Russia but was frothing about the Arabs

the US economy is a huge part of that advantage to Ukraine but even the UK economy is 50% bigger that of Russia's 2 trillion economy (EU is about 17 trillion - US about 26) - Russia is on par with Mexico and a little behind Canada - would you back Mexico to win this war in Russia's place? 

Pez Vela25 Jan 24 12:08

That may be true - but Russia is taking the war a lot more seriously than the West.  Between that and the lack of political will in the West, the odds are a lot more evenly balanced between Russia and Ukraine than one might think (IMO anyway).  

____________________________________________________________________________

during 2023 the West got comfortable that Russia was contained and wouldn't manage anything and got distracted by Hamas - the Russian's didn't realise that and started a program of "oooh, Russia stronk! we're going to wreck Europe next! give in to us!" which has scared everyone into refocusing on the danger 

I am not sure how seriously Russia takes the war in comparison to the West, on the one hand they scramble around for weapons, but you see from the updates that they are hammered by brain drain and worker shortages, they are battered by sanctions which they can to an extend evade but do you think a chinese or kazahk company is selling western components to russia at cost, list or vastly inflated danger money prices? All the while the Kremlin is pretending to ethnic Russians that the war is not a big deal. 

Everything is to an extent a guess but I have said for years that Russia is a hollow shell (it's likely China is a bit the same but China at least has manufacturing capacity) and it is nowhere near to the peer nation status it craves

 

CliveWarren25 Jan 24 15:17

Putin has total control of Russia

____________________________________________

no, he doesn't

if he did, he wouldn't have needed Wagner and Wagner would not have mutinied and his army wouldn't be lacking basic supplies due to corruption

Putin built a system that relies on corruption and his supporters making money off the state, he needs to keep a whole cadre of people happy to stay in power. 

If he just "controlled" Russia he wouldn't need to pretend to have elections and he wouldn't need to try to hide the consequences of the War from the people of Moscow and St Petersburg and he wouldn't have random mums asking about bringing the boys home and half of Russia wouldn't be freezing because someone stole all the money to make the energy grid work. 

Putin is just another dusty mothball politician who puts out press photos to pretend he's some sort of hardened leader, it's all fiction.