Analysis of the Military Position In Ukraine - 13 August

Grace Mappes, Nicole Wolkov, Riley Bailey, Karolina Hird, and Mason Clark

August 13, 2023, 3:20pm ET 

Click here to see ISW’s interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This map is updated daily alongside the static maps present in this report.

Click here to access ISW’s archive of interactive time-lapse maps of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. These maps complement the static control-of-terrain map that ISW produces daily by showing a dynamic frontline. ISW will update this time-lapse map archive monthly.

Note: The data cutoff for this product was 12:00pm ET on August 13. ISW will cover subsequent reports in the August 13 Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment.

Ukrainian forces conducted counteroffensive operations on at least two sectors of the front on August 13 and reportedly advanced in the western Donetsk-eastern Zaporizhia Oblast area and in western Zaporizhia Oblast. The Ukrainian General Staff reported that Ukrainian forces conducted offensive operations in the Berdyansk (western Donetsk-eastern Zaporizhia Oblast area) and Melitopol (western Zaporizhia Oblast) directions and achieved partial success near Robotyne (western Zaporizhia Oblast, 13km south of Orikhiv).[1] Several Russian sources claimed on August 12 that Russian forces withdrew from Urozhaine (in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast area), although many Russian sources refuted those claims on August 13 and claimed instead that Russian forces still occupy the southern part of Urozhaine, that fighting is ongoing, and that areas of Urozhaine are contested.[2] ISW has not observed confirmation that Russian forces have completely withdrawn from Urozhaine and Russian forces likely currently maintain positions in at least the southern part of the settlement.

Zapr

The Russian information space is seizing on Ukrainian gains in Urozhaine (in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area) to highlight poor Russian morale and command challenges in the area. A Russian milblogger complained on August 12 that the Russian 37th Separate Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade (36th Combined Arms Army, Eastern Military District) failed to dedicate tank units to support its infantry in Urozhaine and prematurely withdrew from Urozhaine on August 10, claiming they lacked reinforcements when in reality the unit’s personnel were drunk in the rear areas.[3] The milblogger complained that the entire 36th Combined Arms Army (CAA) is unwilling to defend the settlement while the Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) “Kaskad” Operational Tactical Combat Formation and the 40th Naval Infantry Brigade (Pacific Fleet) defend Urozhaine.[4] These complaints generated a multitude of responses in the Russian information space, including attempts to deescalate tensions between the implicated Russian formations, doubling down on complaints against the 37th Brigade and 36th CAA, and accusing the initial milblogger who reported a Russian withdrawal from Urozhaine of attempting to inflate the reputation of other defending units at the expense of the 36th CAA’s reputation.[5] One milblogger blamed the current situation on the front on the Russian military command’s removal of Major General Ivan Popov as commander of the 58th CAA in early July 2023.[6] The milbloggers notably targeted their complaints at the personnel of these units rather than the unit or theater commanders, suggesting that Popov’s removal and other rumored command purges may have removed mid-level Russian military commanders as a readily available scapegoat for Russian military failures.[7] Alexander Khodakovsky, commander of the “Vostok” battalion defending near Urozhaine, referenced Russian Airborne Forces (VDV) Commander Colonel General Mikhail Teplinsky as saying that Russia cannot win in defense, and Khodakovsky complained that Russia expended its resources too early in the war and now needs to pause to accumulate resources for a new operation, indicating recognition that the Russian elastic defense in this area has its limitations.[8] Teplinsky is reportedly responsible for planning the Russian defense of the Velyka Novosilka area.[9]

Vre

A Russian warship forcibly stopped and searched a civilian cargo ship en route to the Izmail port in Odesa Oblast, likely as part of a Kremlin effort to curtail maritime traffic to Ukrainian ports without committing naval assets to fully enforce a blockade. The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) stated that the Russian Vasily Bykov patrol ship forcibly stopped and searched a dry cargo ship sailing under the flag of Palau after it did not respond to the Vasily Bykov’s demand for inspection.[10] The Russian MoD stated that the Russian forces conducted small arms warning fire near the civilian ship before a Ka-29 helicopter landed on the vessel with a group of Russian personnel.[11] The Russian MoD claimed that the Russian personnel conducted an inspection and then allowed the civilian vessel to continue along its route to the Izmail port.[12]

The Russian MoD announced on July 19 that it would consider all ships en route to Ukrainian ports as potential military cargo carriers and the flag countries of such vessels as “involved in the Ukrainian conflict on the side of the Kyiv regime.”[13] Russian forces did not stop three civilian ships which openly advertised their destination as Ukraine over their ships‘ automatic identification system (AIS) on July 30.[14] The reports of the three civilian ships sailing to Ukraine unhindered suggested that Russian forces may be unable or unwilling to forcibly stop and search neutral vessels, and Russian forces likely conducted their first forced inspection to reimpose the threat of escalation against civilian vessels en route to Ukraine.[15] Russian forces also likely conducted the forced stop and inspection to undermine confidence in temporary trading corridors through the Black Sea to Ukrainian ports, which Ukrainian officials announced on August 10.[16] The Russian naval posturing in the Black Sea is likely intentionally ambiguous and seeks to create a chilling effect on civilian maritime traffic to Ukraine without requiring Russian forces to commit Black Sea Fleet assets to the enforcement of a naval blockade.[17] The Russian military is likely less willing to commit the Black Sea Fleet to such a blockade than it was in July following notable Ukrainian strikes on Russian naval targets in the Black Sea and the Novorossiysk naval base in Krasnodar Krai in early August.[18]

Key Takeaways:

  • Ukrainian forces conducted counteroffensive operations on at least two sectors of the front on August 13 and reportedly advanced in the western Donetsk-eastern Zaporizhia Oblast area and in western Zaporizhia Oblast.
  • ISW has not observed confirmation that Russian forces have completely withdrawn from Urozhaine and Russian forces likely currently maintain positions in at least the southern part of the settlement.
  • The Russian information space is seizing on Ukrainian gains in Urozhaine (in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area) to highlight poor Russian morale and command challenges in the area.
  • A Russian warship forcibly stopped and searched a civilian cargo ship en route to the Izmail port in Odesa Oblast, likely as part of a Kremlin effort to curtail maritime traffic to Ukrainian ports without committing naval assets to fully enforce a blockade.
  • Russian forces conducted offensive operations along the Kupyansk-Svatove line and attempted to regain lost positions near Bakhmut, in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area, and in western Zaporizhia Oblast, and reportedly advanced in some areas.
  • Ukrainian forces conducted offensive operations along the Kupyansk-Svatove line, near Kreminna, near Bakhmut, in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area, and in western Zaporizhia Oblast, and reportedly advanced in several areas.
  • The Wagner Group is likely downsizing and reconfiguring to adapt to financial pressure following the June 24 Wagner rebellion.
  • Ukrainian partisans claimed to have attacked a Russian military base in occupied Mariupol on August 13.

https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaig…

The Ukrainians seem to be settling back into small attritional advances again, although perhaps the reported advance into Urozhaine is more significant than it seems, ironically because of a lack of Russian opposition.  If it is a more significant operation, it could mirror the escalation in operational size and ambition we saw 10 days ago around Robotyne, and represents the Ukrainian forces in this new area also working up to much larger operations in the future designed to actually break into and through the Russian defensive lines.

Interesting escalation in the Black Sea with the Russians stopping a neutral ship - the sort of thing that has started wars in the past (though I think Palau will probably let it go, this time at least). It's likely a careful step in influencing the negotiations that are undoubtibly going on regrading Ukrainian grain exports - the Russians will be seeking to extract maximum concessions, while avoiding as far as possible the risk that NATO countries feel forced to declare the Black Sea, or routes through it, closed to Russian military activity.    

https://militaryland.net/news/invasion-day-536-summary/

The summary of the situation of Russian re-invasion to Ukraine covering the recent developments on the battlefield, as of 13th August 2023 – 22:00 (Kyiv time).

Due to low intensity of fighting and only minor changes on the ground, I’ve decided to reduce the number of summaries. Starting August 9, there’ll be two summaries per week, released on Wednesday and Sunday.

Sloboda Front

includes the area of between Oskil and Aydar river

Slo

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Andriivka

Siverskyi Donets

overview map of Slovyansk, Kramatorsk, Bakhmut and Lysychansk vicinity

Siv

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • No activity reported.

Bakhmut Front

includes the vicinity of Bakhmut

Bak

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Andriivka, Yahidne

Avdiivka Front

includes the vicinity of Avdiivka

Avd

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Avdiivka

Donetsk Front

includes the center and southern part of Donetsk Oblast

Don

  • Ukrainian forces advanced and reached the center of Urozhaine. (source)
  • Russian forces were seen retreating under artillery fire from Urozhaine settlement. (source)
  • Given the information above, I think it’s safe to assume there is no Russian presence in the settlement.

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Marinka, Staromayorske

Zaporizhzhia Front

includes the Zaporizhzhia Oblast

Zap

  • Ukrainian forces entered Robotyne settlement from the north. The village is now contested. (source)

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • Robotyne

Kherson Front

includes the left bank of Dnipro river south of Kherson and Kakhovka

Ukrainian General Staff reports repelled attacks in the vicinity of:

  • No activity reported.

 

UK Ministry of Defence: https://www.facebook.com/theministryofdefence/

Risky - i sometimes dont get your takes - in what world is a resurgent Russia good for western wealth and prosperity?

I take this from a right-wing perspective, they are a geo-political rival who is face planting into a proxy - this is good for us - the costs lof funding ukraine to knock about the russian military are far lower than having to do it ourselves, so why not bleed them until they break?

I am not a utopian, but as a matter of real-politik i prefer it being the west calling the shots globally not strong-men dictatorships. 

I don't really know what is happening out there, but a smaller scale "bite and hold" approach can be effective (eg the Hundred Days offensive in 1918) and may be more sensible at the present time than trying for the big breakthrough.  

The Russians have their own issues too - they're burning through shells at a tremendous rate - thought to be 20,000 per day or more - and although they started the war with very large stockpiles, ammo and consumables (gun barrels etc) must be a concern.  Ukraine is of course trying to compound this by hitting munitions depots etc.  The question is can they disrupt Russian ammo supplies (and of course neutralize Russian artillery assets) enough to make a real difference at operational level?  

Ukrainian operations across the Dnipro are interesting - apparently a pretty significant artillery duel is going on there as well.  

 

Risky - i sometimes dont get your takes - in what world is a resurgent Russia good for western wealth and prosperity?

Easier to understand once you realize his sole "take" is trying to annoy the right people.   

Bigbadbillybob14 Aug 23 10:20

Risky - i sometimes dont get your takes - in what world is a resurgent Russia good for western wealth and prosperity?

___________________________________________________________

there is a belief in hard right circles that russia is a strong conservative christian nation where real men live and capitalism thrives and that in particular it is a strong ally against the muslims and the chinese 

it's completely mental and based on being suckered in by the carefully staged management of the way dictatorial regimes are percieved (Russia stronk memes etc) 

I suspect it is this driving the takes of the likes of FB on the Russia/Ukraine conflict