said they recognised the name of a Labour frontbencher who doesn't exist. Even allowing for people trying to look more clued up than they are it shows how disengaged people really are. I would expect the same result for a Tory with a suitable name like James Barnabas-Jones.
Search RollOnFriday
0
3
What was the name of the person who doesn't exist?
0
3
Fiona Wilson.
0
4
Will the real Fiona Wilson please step forward.
I knew it!
1
5
A bigger issue is the fact that, despite being fictitious, she still has more substance than Kier Starmer.
0
3
“A bigger issue is the fact that, despite being fictitious, she still has more substance than Kier Starmer. “
lol
Meat shields missing the point No. 379
The same story can be restated as:
Further proof of how badly Tories are going to do at the GE as evidenced by the willingness of Gen Pop to vote for ANYONE identifying as Labour …even fictional Labour candidates
0
3
SummerSails 22 Mar 24 09:30
Even allowing for people trying to look more clued up than they are it shows how disengaged people really are.
_______________________________________________________________________________
I don't think it shows how disengaged people are, I think it shows how little politics matters outside of its bubble
it doesn't help that it is quite slow moving (cough, emergency Rawanda leglisation has taken how long now and can apparently wait until MPs have their holiday) in a fast moving world
it doesn't help either that it is intrinsically boring, silly and difficult to influence
Join the discussion