I notice he says he is grossly overpaid but that he doesn't set his salary, it is set by the remuneration committee.

I'm sure if he voluntarily offered to only receive half of it they wouldn't kick up a fuss. He didn't seem to want to go that far.

remuneration committees who all on the executive gravy train themselves and who it suits to pretend that these people do jobs so extraordinarily and uniquely well that they deserve multi million pound salaries

Guy Crouchback 19 Jan 24 13:57

recieves £4.5m this year for delivering "shareholder value"

Why did we privatise again?

______________________________________________________________________

the tories needed money to cut taxes for the wealthiest - it was sold as investing the future 

"checks recent gas prices" 

saw him on the BBC this morning and my jaw hit the desk with his bod face admittance of how much he earns and probably doesn't deserve it.

Then he told a story of his mum being on a fixed income and she was suffering too... but the shareholders, that's what's important.

his mum is apparently struggling on the state pension while he he pulls in £4.5m a year,  WTF?

He's the worst kind of khunt.

Performative shame, when its actually water of a duck's back.

remuneration committees who all on the executive gravy train themselves and who it suits to pretend that these people do jobs so extraordinarily and uniquely well that they deserve multi million pound salaries

How dare you!  Just look at the experience of the RemCo Chair and their entire independence from the culture of public service to privatised business payments for failure.

And if she’s not independent enough, Amber Rudd is on the RemCo to balance it out.

It’s fvcking laughable 

Gerald ratner-ish moment

why did we decide to introduce private profit motive into the supply of utilities fgs

It was totally fvcking stupid for everything apart from telecoms, given telecoms operates a genuinely competitive market.