It’s pretty clear that the reason for this is that the jury did not take the claimant seriously.
“He is claiming $300,000”, they will have said to themselves, “This is America. We sue McDonald’s for $495,000,000,000,000 if our chicken nuggets are cold. This chap therefore cannot be serious or have faith in his claim. It is clearly a try on.”
and so it came to be that he lost.
0
1
Is she not fragrant?
0
1
Didn't he start at £3.5m and get knocked down? Either way he was grifting and lost.
0
1
I watched him under cross examination. The guy is a clown
🤡 ⚖️🎿
0
1
He compared her to Epstein
1
1
Causation does not imply correlation issue. Chancer, eh. I think Gwinnie comported herself excellently. Despite her health loon shit, I’m still a fan.
0
0
Rof Royalty
Didn't he start at £3.5m
--------------------
Still not REAL money in American legal terms. Dude should have showed some front, established that we was a playa.
0
2
Given the poor performance of her lawyers, it was pretty clear she was going to win regardless of what happened at the trial.
Privilege in action.
0
1
Did he let out a blood curdling scream?
0
1
He was a chancer.
8
1
He can no longer tell the difference between Pinot Noir and Cab Sauv at his wine tastings, BUT she missed half a day of skiing.
In many ways they are both victims of this tragic accident.
0
1
He should have stayed at Douglas Motors.
0
1
What a farrago.
Never skied m'self, but I would have thought collisions on the slopes are reasonably unremarkable.
0
1
7 years later. What are the costs going to be?
0
1
Do they do no-win no fee out there?
0
1
Benj they are generally but most collisions don't involve someone who's publicly known to be rather well off.
0
1
Bet she’s burning one of her scented candles in celebration.
0
1
Bet she's got a dinosaur egg up her snatch in celebration.
0
1
Lovely mental image of that scene from jurassic park when the raptor hatches, and it poking its head out of Gwinnie's candle scented tuppence.
Thanks ROR.
Join the discussion