yeah! everyone should absolutely do business in the highest tax jurisdiction possible! even though there’s no law obliging them to do so desoite elected governments being well aware they do so! yeah! that makes sense! huh!
I remember someone in the Jersey Tax Authority saying with a straight face that there are loads of reasons to do business there that have NOTHING to do with tax (nothing!)
No, it’s all about tax. But the U.K. tax authorities know this and yet, despite having legislative power to compel at their disposal, they do nothing to ban it. There is no moral obligation to pay more tax than the law requires of you.
‘yeah! everyone should absolutely do business in the highest tax jurisdiction possible! even though there’s no law obliging them to do so desoite elected governments being well aware they do so! yeah! that makes sense! huh!’
In any event, sardonically pillorying the idea of a moral obligation to pay more tax than necessary is, in the context of rebuttal of remarks about paying a “fair” amount of tax, the very opposite of a non sequitur HTHHTHHTH
Many clients use Jersey and Guernsey companies for entirely non-tax reasons. They have stable and well understood company law regimes, without all the capital maintenance rules.
I gather it is a complete does.
from whom do you gather this
Is it like jersey where they have to pop down to the viscount’s department to get things stamped and charge a fortune for sod all work?
There are some very good lawyers in Jersey. Guernsey is mixed.
Its similar to comparing Cayman to the BVI. The brains are in Cayman.
if u don't like it u could always just get your clients to pay a fair amount of tax instead
define “fair”
fair to me is that the law is clear and you comply with it
Lol @ people dealing with low tax jurisdictions moaning that the legal system is a bit backward and parochial
cry me a fvcking river
I’ve contributed almost nothing and look how they treat me!!!
yeah! everyone should absolutely do business in the highest tax jurisdiction possible! even though there’s no law obliging them to do so desoite elected governments being well aware they do so! yeah! that makes sense! huh!
Haro! Haro! Haro! À l'aide, mon Prince, on me fait tort.
I remember someone in the Jersey Tax Authority saying with a straight face that there are loads of reasons to do business there that have NOTHING to do with tax (nothing!)
No, it’s all about tax. But the U.K. tax authorities know this and yet, despite having legislative power to compel at their disposal, they do nothing to ban it. There is no moral obligation to pay more tax than the law requires of you.
‘yeah! everyone should absolutely do business in the highest tax jurisdiction possible! even though there’s no law obliging them to do so desoite elected governments being well aware they do so! yeah! that makes sense! huh!’
*sounds Lord Halifax’s giant non-sequitur alarm*
Lord Halifax! He was a fvcking tit wasn’t he. Created a new username to fake his own death IIRC. LOL.
He was very confused
even by rof standards
In any event, sardonically pillorying the idea of a moral obligation to pay more tax than necessary is, in the context of rebuttal of remarks about paying a “fair” amount of tax, the very opposite of a non sequitur HTHHTHHTH
How high would your tax have to be for you to consider it immoral woke-man? Don’t comment on me, I know you think I should be a slave for the state
Many clients use Jersey and Guernsey companies for entirely non-tax reasons. They have stable and well understood company law regimes, without all the capital maintenance rules.
Laz, what letter did the name of the firm begin with?
NOTHING to do with tax I know I know!
Well said Gloria.
where else would you find a well understood company law regime!
It’s the combination of things that make it a winner
for sure for sure
what EU blacklist no worries no worries, friend
Nowhere near eu blacklists. Unlike some.
heh you said that as though I was President of Dubai!
God that would be weird and sweet
Join the discussion