
"I wonder how many 'likes' this will get on LinkedIn..."
The Singapore Law Society Vice President has resigned following comments he made on LinkedIn about a woman who had been raped.
Chia Boon Teck posted his comments about a case where a TikToker, Len Panfilov, was convicted of raping a woman. The lawyer highlighted a news report headed "Singapore-based TikToker found guilty of raping woman he met on Tinder", and then proceeded to list ten points criticising the victim, rather than the perpetrator.
In one of his ill-judged comments, Chia noted that the victim had met the perpetrator on the dating app, Tinder, and pondered: "what's Tinder well known for? It ain't no LinkedIn."
Listing the two counts of rape and sexual assault, Chia questioned whether the victim was "awake throughout the marathon".
And reflecting on the description of the victim as a 30 year old actress and model, the senior lawyer commented: "not exactly a babe in the woods."



The post, since deleted
Chia's musings about the rape case went down as well in the Lion City's legal community, as a rotten egg in a Singapore Sling.
The country's Minister of Law, K. Shanmugam, lambasted Chia, saying: “I am surprised that we still come across someone saying this: When a woman says ‘No’, she does not actually mean ‘No’.” The minister also voiced his concerns over the "impact" that Chia's "statement may have on other victims."
Stefanie Yuen Thio, joint managing partner at TSMP Law Corporation, slammed Chia for going "against what the courts have actually said is appropriate cross-examination," adding “I’m appalled at this attitude from an individual who holds the office of a leader of the Bar.”
At the junior end of the profession, Clifford Chance associate, Joel Sherard, posted on LinkedIn: "Such insinuations are, in my view, quite unacceptable, especially from someone who should be setting an example for younger members of the profession."
Meanwhile the Association of Women for Action and Research said: "When a senior lawyer mocks a rape survivor, it isn't just offensive. It's dangerous."
Chia reportedly reacted to the criticism, by commenting: “As a criminal lawyer, my intent was not to cast blame on any party, but to highlight the importance of situational awareness - both to guard against being assaulted and to avoid actions that could later be misconstrued.”
However, the Singapore Law Society rebuked Chia, saying his comments did "not represent the views of the Law Society." The society's president called for Chia to resign for his "unacceptable" views, stating: "The victim's morality should not have been questioned in this manner," said the president, especially from a person "in a position of leadership."
Chia has now stepped down as the Law Society's VP.
Comments
65
51
I wonder if he had a mental breakdown...?! This odd rant sounds like coming from someone that The Donald would call a "low IQ person", not from an experienced criminal lawyer. As a senior member of the Singapore Bar, he should really know better than to sound off like that.
66
89
Well, if you look at the evidence, a lot of it doesn’t stack up. The judge didn’t appear to know Tinder was a hook up ap. She went to his bedroom to talk about business? Yeah, right…
77
63
Chia at 11:37, there
66
51
@Anonymous 28 March 25 11:37
Hi BaBoon Teck, nice of you to join us.
69
58
Question Man unmasked?
50
59
Singaporeans have always been a bit 'old fashioned' wink
71
67
No answer woman attempting to shut down questions?
52
51
Having a healthy level of skepticism about any such allegations is sensible, but it does somewhat boggle the mind that one of the things he thinks undermines her account of events is the fact that she's 30. Because everyone knows that 30 year old women are more likely to lie about sexual assault one assumes?
51
54
We'd need to review the evidence before being able to make an informed decision.
64
52
03 April 15:12 - This has nothing to do with "allegations". The perpetrator was convicted of rape. There is no room for skepticism about whether or not the victim was raped. That being so, no-one has any place suggesting she was "asking for it" or the like.
60
53
Chia's views are sadly reflective of much of Singapore's rather backward, P.R.China influenced society - inter-race relationship are still often criticised and homosexuality is taboo (if, finally, not illegal). However, for this to have come from someone senior in the Law Society is bizarre. Usually anything that anyone in mid to high office here says is carefully scrutinised and bland.