
With profit per equity partner hovering around $7million, it's no wonder they need your help.
Despite working at one of the richest law firms in the world, solicitors at US firm Quinn Emanuel are seeking donations from the public to help them fight a legal case.
The lawyers have launched a crowdfunder which aims to raise £15,000 to help them obtain an injunction to stop a litigant bombarding them with abusive emails.
Marian Okunola was sentenced to six months in prison for contempt of court after she breached an injunction not to harass members of staff at her former employer, Titan Wealth Holdings Limited.
She widened her target to include Titan’s lawyers at Quinn Emanuel, sending them emails which were described as “abusive, and often sexually explicit” by Mrs Justice Hill at a hearing to consider the grant of another injunction.
Quinn Emanuel disputes partner Yasseen Gailani laid out 103 pages of Okunola’s emails to make his point, which the judge agreed were “repetitive, at times pointless”, and which included “gratuitously distressing and demeaning content”.
They also came in the established Loon font of “all bold capitals, large text and with repeated exclamation marks” which the judge said “added to their threatening nature”.
Okunola’s "threatening" and "sexually abusive" content was aimed at people linked to the lawyers as well, including Gailani’s mother.
When Gailani told Okunola he was not going to respond to her “egregious and highly abusive” e-mails and would make a police complaint, she reported him to the police the next day herself, alleging that he had lied, perverted the course of justice and engaged in witness intimidation.
Her “shocking” conduct extended to the court room, said Justice Hill. When “I rose on 9 October 2024, in front of court staff, the Defendant repeatedly shouted ‘scum’ at junior counsel and the rest of the Claimants’ legal team, ending her outburst with ‘injunct that’”, she said.
But she rejected Titan’s application to expand the injunction to protect its lawyers, ruling that Quinn would have to seek an injunction itself. However, she also granted leave to appeal her decision.
Shaking the tin for donations on LinkedIn, Gailani said his firm had agreed to act pro bono on an appeal, for which he gave “huge thanks to the London management team”.
Apparently paying for the barristers was a step too far for the impoverished multi-millionaires heading up the firm. While the two barristers engaged on the matter have agreed to appear in the appeal for free, the targeted solicitors have been reduced to crowdfunding £15k from Joe Public to pay for their barristers’ fees and disbursements.
In Gailani’s crowdfunder pitch for "Court of Appeal Proceedings to Protect Lawyers from Abuse", he desribed how "the abuse the team endured in this case was grotesque and wholly unacceptable".
"With luck, if we are successful on the appeal, the risk of legal representatives suffering similar abuse in the future in other cases will be very significantly reduced."
Asked why the firm wasn’t stumping up the equivalent of a week’s coffee budget to help protect its staff from harassment, a spokesperson for Quinn Emanuel told RollOnFriday, "The firm has already made a significant contribution towards funding the costs of the appeal by agreeing to conduct it on a pro bono basis. In relation to the remaining costs, several of our partners have either made, or will be making, material donations to the fund".
At the time of writing, the lawyers had raised £3,580 from 16 pledges.
Comments
96
28
"Injuct that!"
Quality.
103
29
Wouldn't the firm have a contractual duty to protect its staff?
79
29
"The firm has already made a significant contribution towards funding the costs of the appeal by agreeing to conduct it on a pro bono basis." Oh yeah, and fook our employees.
59
27
Nah son, ain't nobody want to donate to that.
109
25
I’d like to think that my firm would protect me from vile abuse like this regardless of the cost as part of its duties as my employer…
119
34
Message just in from Lord Lester: "I like Marian Okunola!"
57
28
could you maybe post some of these "gratuitous and sexually explicit" emails that you dangle there in front of us
it is a Friday afterall
86
28
I was going to donate my money to children in war-torn countries but instead, I'll donate it so a mega-rich US firm doesn't have to foot more of the bill!
68
31
Talk about a PR misfire. Who advises these people? This should go mainstream/national.
For shame, Quinn and Yasseen - what were you actually thinking?
25
24
@ Sumoking 03 October 25 09:49
They gave us the peel instead of the orange.
69
27
It’s one thing to maximise profits by minimising unnecessary costs (in QE’s case, for example, by making your lawyers buy all of their own IT equipment).
It’s quite another to refuse to fork out the equivalent of one days worth of profit for ONE equity partner in order to help defend your own people against harassment so bad that a judge is willing to restrain it.
I’m genuinely not sure that I can think of any other serious law firm that wouldn’t just foot the bill itself.
Not a great look.
79
24
This really highlights that Quinn Emanuel are a bunch of paper tigers. They are consistently overly aggressive and outright rude when dealing with other lawyers, all as part of their macho “We’re trial lawyers. Everyone fears us” marketing. Yet when someone dishes it back at them what do they do: cower in the corner, mess up what should have been a straightforward injunction application, and then shamelessly beg the public for money.
60
24
Let’s see…I could donate some of my hard-won earnings to Cancer Research, RNLI, the Trussell Trust, RSPCA…or folk at a firm where NQ pay reached £180k last year. That’s just under £9k pcm.
Clearly this is distressing for them, but £15k shouldn’t be out of their reach.
25
29
xxx
48
26
It is clear from the original judgment that if they had just issued a claim form in the first place, the problem would have gone away and they would have been granted the injunction.
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2024/2641.html
34
29
Doesn't a QE fee earner bring in 15k in about 1.5 hours?
46
27
Typical of a shop packed full of Poundland tyrants and chinless little men, particularly so in London.
Only those of dull mind and little talent opt to work in those pits.
54
32
Acting "pro bono"? Do me a favour ... they are acting for themselves!!!
21
25
Thoughts and prayers
24
24
Crikey
31
27
When you thought law firm partners could not get any lower...
39
25
As a recipient of a good many of these unhinged emails from La Okunola myself (at another firm), I just laughed and protected myself from harassment simply by setting up a rule in Outlook to divert it all into another folder.
22
24
Our thoughts and prayers are with the Quinn Emanuel lawyers [...] at this difficult time