Rof News

either is swamped by comments or they don't like people musing on Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates van Winkelhof  from 2014

makes you think the decision to give more parental leave probably has something behind it other than altruism 

Still no comment approved 4 hours later? 

I guess that Clydes news piece really is an advert pretending to be news 

oh Rof, you used to take the piss out of big law

yes but not my "aren't they famous for sacking a pregnant partner who was whistle blowing to the AML team then saying she's a partner so doesn't get protections" one