More misrepresentation

ah, “net zero watch”, the rebranded “global warming policy foundation”

is there ne degree of sinister misinformation u won’t unquestioningly guzzle and thereafter dissemin7 elfffi?

y r u so incapable of critically thinking?

Ah, so now I see where you get your information from, Elfffi.  Do you ever read any of the primary source material, or is it all just taking fossil fuel lobbyists and alt-right Twitter threads at their word?

Classic - "these stress tests are planning for the absolute worst scenario!"

Do these morons ask for the fire retardation in their homes to be downgraded so it is just enough to slow fires at a temperature most household fires burn at? 

Stage 1 it didn’t happen

Stage 2 it might have happened but it isn’t reported anywhere

Stage 3 it is reported but not by a source I like

Where we are?  Why did you skip the first two stages?

dude, u always try 2 play that game 4getting that u have never made it passed stage 1

stage 1 elfffi “clim7 change didn’t happen”

ur problem is, and i say this with the utmost respect in the circumstances, ur a totally gullible fooking idiot

This is nothing new for the bank. They produced a headline grabbing ‘gdp will drop by x pc’ brexit report and were then forced to admit it included no policy changes/action by the govt. 

Love how he deflects his sole reliance on fake/misrep news sites as somehow non-morons being irrationally choosy.  "you said you were hungry, but I served you a bowl of arsenic-laced dog turds, and you turned your nose up at it - are you actually hungry?  I'd say not!!!"

We have seen the injustices caused by the CJEU’s overriding purpose being to use the justice system to achieve ‘ever closer Union’, rather than the pursuit of justice or the well-being of the peoples of the EU.

Now we see the distortion of the Bank of England’s role.  They find it hard enough to hit the inflation target.  Saying they should have an economic growth target as well was always an extremely large ask, if not impossible.  Adding a third objective ‘Net zero by 2050’ guarantees that they will not be able to control inflation.

Carrie is to blame, and Rishi was her foot soldier …

Amidst what was largely a disappointing budget from a climate perspective, Rishi Sunak made one major announcement: updating the Bank’s remit to support growth that is ​‘also environmentally sustainable and consistent with a net zero economy something that NEF has long campaigned for. The Bank’s updated mandate on climate, which also extends to its Financial Policy Committee and Prudential Regulation Authority, is a broad one, covering all the major areas of policy and regulation. This enables the Bank to act with the ambition necessary to deliver the government’s target of net zero emissions by 2050, as well as alignment with the Paris Agreement. Finance is not a silver bullet to fix environmental and climate challenges, but, due to its vast scale and influence, it is one of the single most important things to get right.

https://neweconomics.org/2021/05/the-bank-of-englands-new-net-zero-mand…

no elfffi

u posted a link from a fantasist website 

u dribbled and stuck ur fingers in ur ears when it was pointed out that these guys have zero credibility or expertise and chat absolute shit

ur firmly at the stage of “climate change didn’t happen”. if u could stop posting, tighten ur slackjaw, steady ur eyes, wipe the foam from ur mouth and at least hurry in2 stage 2 of pretending that climate change might have happened but it isn’t a bad thing, that would b super. 

cos u posting ur usual tripe is just tedious. ur essentially a god-botherer who doesn’t believe in evolution - that’s the equivalent degree of stupidity