Does she ROF?

The prisoner is scum and the sentences are a joke. Re the lawyer not sure how it can be regulatory?- unless she knew he had a phone in breach of rules maybe?

Why on earth would he have been "arrested", unless perhaps if the pictures were unsolicited or constituted harassment or something? Nothing to indicate that's the case here, and it seems somewhat unlikely. 

Also heh @ the article's reference to "vulnerable prisoner". 

Clive - any criminal lawyer would know it is strictly against the rules for inmates to have mobiles.

I assume that prisoners are also not permitted to view any computer etc. whilst in prison.

So, any message sent by the Lascivious Lawyer to him on any form of message media would have been sent knowing he was breaking the rules, which I think most of us would consider to be a regulatory issue…?

What I want to know is how do you get 50 different 'views'... ...I was thinking about this and ran out of ideas after 20 (for the purposes of this thought exercise I have excluded toys... ...and animals).

 

Fluffy, if you send me those 20 shots, I will engage in some vigorous research and revert shortly with suggestions for the other 30.

And a Happy New Year to all...