https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2019/1662.html
£500k on costs and the only asset is a flat worth £298k. How on earth did they not manage to accrue more. City lawyer and spouse working in a paying city, surely they should have saved more?
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2019/1662.html
£500k on costs and the only asset is a flat worth £298k. How on earth did they not manage to accrue more. City lawyer and spouse working in a paying city, surely they should have saved more?
0
0
Try reading as far as para 2.
0
0
heh
0
0
What Buzz said and seems that prior to that they were spaffing money on rent and keeping up with the Jones.
0
0
Has to be some sort of mental issue involved
0
0
Who the fook owns a flat in Panama!
plus £300k in Panama surely buys you more than a flat....
0
0
Agree £300k in Panama would buy you a palace.
0
0
These are not City lawyers. £50k and £100k salaries suggests they were at best paralegals.
LOL @ the PSL jibe from the judge. The distress of the proceedings means the wife has been reduced to the poor excuse for a legal job that is a "support lawyer".
0
0
Lol @ a paralegal on £100k.
0
0
It makes me incandescent when judges make remarks like this. Who the hell do these people think they are?!
**** off, they're exercising their rights as citizens and keeping you in a job you twunt
0
0
Yes I mean it's totally worth them burning all of the assets that could be used to look after the kids on fighting each other via other lawyers.
0
0
Wot sailo said
0
0
It's a matter for them. If these bloody people had their way, no-one would ever use the courts.
0
0
Yes, one has only to think of all of those times when humans lost the urge to litigate even the most petty stuff
0
0
I was addressing dux’s point about judicial comments putting people off litigation
Join the discussion