"He explains that CSM was set up as an online magazine in 2016 by him and two other “Brexiteers” to illuminate what they perceived as the injustice of the undemocratic positions taken by some “Remainers” at that time, and to partake in the campaign to see through the national referendum result, using “the cloak of the Brexit-voting ‘countryside’ to help achieve its aims”.
jmt worth a read - judge obviously didn't think much of D1 and D2
😂😂
Indemnity costs, interim £400k
It was always about sovereignty
The main character behind Country Squire magazine is an absolute vvanker - Packham a bit of an arse but pleased he won this.
I'm staggered that someone who, in the 21st century, called their magazine country squire turns out to be a bit of a cvnt.
Staggered I tell you
he was some sort of “adviser” to the Tory party at one point - a devious spiv
Chris Packham isn't "an arse". He has Asperger's which his detractors can't cope with because he cannot dance around topics in a British way that makes it easy to play the man not the ball, and tells the unvarnished truth. It's problematic for disingenous aunts whose actual rationale for things is "I like doing them and don't want to change."
D2 is an IT consultant called Mr Bean.
lolz
Packham is a bit of an arse Bananas - but it’s nothing to do with his Asperger’s (in case anyone else mistakenly thinks that is what you’re implying)
oh
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4367975
interesting timing
one wonders when he saw the embargoed draft judgment
my view is that if you're down with carole you should be equally down the CSM people who by the same merits won their case.
personally i think this lot were arses and so was carole.
Join the discussion