Allen & Overy is attempting to register the term 'Brexit Law' as a trademark.

The firm has filed applications to register 'Brexit Law' as both EU and UK trademarks at the Intellectual Property Office. The submissions are are to use the term not just for legal advice but also for business management, consultancy, education and training services and for good, thus holding out the tempting prospect of A&O Brexit Law mugs and flags.

Client inboxes around the world have been deluged with emails from lawyers offering helpful advice on the legal implications of the UK's withdrawal from the European Union. But A&O's move represents an attempt to position itself as the definitive Brexit firm. If its applications are successful, the competition will have to choose between 'Out Law', 'Reject Advice' and 'Go Time Help', or risk the wrath of A&O's IP team.

    So many brexciting opportunities

Allen & Overy IP partner Nicola Dagg told the World Intellectual Property Review the firm had "forged a leading reputation for providing comprehensive advice around Brexit", and that "Brexit Law materials represent the best of A&O’s strategic and innovative legal thinking”. Along with several other firms, A&O did some strategic thinking of its own in advance of the referendum and registered a number of its EU lawyers in Ireland to protect their rights of audience and professional privilege. But it appears to be the only one seeking to corner the single market in Brexit-related verbiage

Until now. Inspired by its efforts, RollOnFriday proudly brings you the official Brexit preparation website, RollOnBrexit.com. Offering superior advice to A&O and indeed any other law firm, it is perfect for all your Brexit-planning needs.
 
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 22 July 16 08:03

www.out-law.com is already taken, by the extraordinarily far-sighted Pinsent Masons who snapped it up 15 years ago, just in case...

Anonymous 22 July 16 11:11

Absolutely no chance of that being accepted. What the hell are Allen & Overy thinking? This is the sort of thing you expect from chancers who don't have a clue what rights a registered TM actually give you and rush to register "Prince George" and nonsense like that. Embarrassing.

Anonymous 22 July 16 13:21

If only A&O *actually* understood trade mark law, they would know this mark is unregistrable for what they want. I am also struggling with Nicola claiming that her team has "forged a leading reputation" around something which has not happened yet, and any new law or procedure is many moons away.

Anonymous 22 July 16 14:46

Dagg obviously knows as much about trademarks as she does managing costs https://www.thelawyer.com/issues/14-april-2008/ao-slammed-for-shocking-costs/

Roll On Friday 22 July 16 22:16

I doubt it will be granted. It's too generic. Loads of us are already advising on brexit law - the law on brexit.

Anonymous 28 July 16 09:15

Having seen some of her patent cases, I suspect her trade mark knowledge rivals her patent knowledge.

If it gets published I'll oppose it