Firm of the Year

Pass judgment on your firm and take the RollOnFriday Firm of the Year 2018 survey. 20 seconds of graft for a lifetime of satisfaction. If you're in-house, there's a poll for you, too
  

GlamSol 2017

  

Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.
  

Glamour

Glamour
The legendary Glamorous Solicitor showcases the style, the beauty and the sophistication for which the legal profession is so rightly known.
  

News

Send Us Your News
Exclusive: Simmons & Simmons refuses to say if NQs are on temp contracts
10 March 2017
Rate it
0

Simmons & Simmons has refused to disclose how many of its qualifying trainees are joining the firm on fixed term contracts, citing unspecified "privacy reasons".

This week the firm announced a decent 80% trainee retention rate. It said 12 out of the 15 trainees in its spring-qualifying cohort accepted offers from the firm and were "staying on as NQs". Graduate recruitment partner Devarshi Saksena said, “We are pleased with the March 2017 results and I’d like to congratulate everyone on their qualification. Trainee development is an important part of the strategy of the firm and we’re receiving great feedback on our new Skills Academy”.

It follows a string of poor trainee retention results which identified Simmons & Simmons as an unattractive destination for students seeking a post-qualification career. A dozen of last autumn's qualifiers, half the intake, were not retained. In spring 2016, six left out of 13, and it was only marginally better in autumn 2015, when 18 stayed but 10 were not retained. However, a source told RollOnFriday that the 80% retention rate announced this spring was a sham. Several of qualifying trainees were, they said, only joining the firm on six month fixed term contracts. "Sly" Simmons made the offers "just to boost their retention rate".  

A spokeswoman refused to disclose to RollOnFriday how many, if any, of its qualifying trainees were being employed on fixed term contracts. She said that the firm could not provide an answer "due to employee privacy reasons", but would not state what the reasons were. Simmons has form when it comes to massaging woeful trainee retention figures. In spring 2016 RollOnFriday revealed that the firm had misled the market by claiming a 77% trainee retention rate, when in fact it was 54%. Simmons had secretly discounted from its figures four trainees who had decided to leave the firm.

    Not again, Simmochio! 

FTCs can function as an entirely benign instrument for firms to continue to employ good trainees when their departments of choice are under-worked, often in the mutual hope that demand will increase sufficiently to require their long-term services in a few months. However, when their use is not disclosed, it can appear as if the firm is seeking to paint a healthier picture of post-qualification career prospects than the reality. As in 2015, anyone taking Simmons at its word today is potentially basing one of the most important career decisions of their life on a load of cobblers. 

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

anonymous user
10/03/2017 03:03
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Firms across the market are doing this and no one is batting an eyelid.

It would also be unfair to the NQs (particularly given the small intake size) to reveal to the world (including clients) that some of them are on fixed term contracts.

Agree that graduates need transparency on rates, and that Simmons were wrong to skew them in spring '16, but other firms who have recently posted retention rates have not faced the same scrutiny of their contractual relationships with their NQs.
anonymous user
11/03/2017 15:02
Rate it
2
Report as offensive
I suggest that ROF reports retention rates as a % retained together with the % confirmed to be permanent rather than fixed term.

Simmons would be reported as 80% retention (none confirmed permanent).

Any firm that didn't want a similar report, would have to confirm how many were fixed term contracts.

Many firms would I'm sure be happy to report that all of their retained NQs were permanent.
anonymous user
12/03/2017 17:55
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Sh1t firm. Not MC
skidaddle
15/03/2017 10:51
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
"Firms across the market are doing this and no one is batting an eyelid"

So you as a Simmons bod are saying that Simmons is in fact doing this? Not unfair to reveal that all of them are on permanent contracts if they are. And it is not a standard practice at decent firms to put a significant percentage of trainees on fixed term contracts. And, yes, Simmons receives more scrutiny because of its historically abysmal retention rates which have suddenly "perked up".
anonymous user
17/03/2017 10:12
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Why is anyone ever surprised by this! I am pretty sure there is a story about S&S doing this every 6 months.
  

Weekly Email Update

To receive a weekly European email update, please login or register to RollOnFriday.