Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.

Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook



The legendary Glamorous Solicitor showcases the style, the beauty and the sophistication for which the legal profession is so rightly known.

Europe News

Send Us Your News
KWM Europe faces oblivion after partners decide not to save it
25 November 2016
Rate it

The firm which used to be known as SJ Berwin looks set to disintegrate after partners decided not to put their hands in their pockets to save it.

King & Wood Mallesons' European and Middle East offices (which made up SJB before it merged with KWM in 2013) have been in crisis for months. Insiders say more than 50 partners have fled over the last year and the firm's debt stands at around £35m.

Partners were called in to an emergency meeting two weeks ago where they were informed of the gravity of the situation. A few days later, the firm's European Managing and Senior Partners flew to China to beg for help. They got it, with a couple of conditions. Partners were told that their Far Eastern board would bail them out - as long as they stumped up £14 million between them and agreed to be locked in to the firm for 12 months. Junior partners were asked to pump in £60k each. Equity partners were asked for an extra £4k per equity point on top of the £4k they had already paid, equating to contributions ranging from £80k at the bottom of the ladder to £240k at the top. They were given until this week to decide whether to share or to shaft.

SJB partners had a reputation for being hard-nosed when it came to corporate deals, and it may have been well-deserved. Management held a series of one-on-one chats with the partners, and it soon became clear that far too few were prepared to agree to both the capital contributions and the lock-in. Just 21 partners out of 130 signed up to the deal, RollOnFriday understands.

  "To share, or to shaft? You've made your bets!" 

This week a spokeswoman confirmed that KWM EUME, "has not been able to complete its planned recapitalisation programme", because, "regrettably, insufficient value of new capital was committed". 
The situation is now so dire the firm has publicly acknowledged that it is looking for a merger (read: takeover) to survive. Even that would be something as rumours are swirling around the City of further departures.

Nevertheless, the firm's spokeswoman said they would "continue to service the needs of clients, operating on a business as usual approach". Doubtless staff will do their best. But unless lawyers and non-fee-earners normally work while staring down the barrel of unemployment, circulating their CVs and trying to identify which partners screwed them over, business as usual is going to be difficult.

Here's a suggestion: in case the worst happens, why doesn't every firm that takes a partner from KWM, or has done in the last year, offer to rescue a trainee (and perhaps an associate and a non-fee-earner as well)? So far, that would mean berths at firms including:

  • Arnold & Porter
  • Ashurst
  • Baker Botts
  • Clifford Chance
  • Covington & Burling
  • Dechert
  • Dentons
  • Forsters
  • Fried Frank
  • Goodwin Procter
  • Keystone Law
  • Mayer Brown
  • Mishcon
  • Proskauer Rose
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • Taylor Wessing
  • Willkie Farr

It's the decent thing to do. If you're the Managing Partner at one of these firms and minded to share the love, please drop us an email to let us know and we'll give you a very public pat on the back.

STOP PRESS: Received this morning:

"Dear Roll on Friday
We spotted your article and totally agree that the legal profession should be helping out KWM and we would be very happy to talk to any person or any team that wants to stay together. While we usually only recruit partners with client followings, we are now hiring across the board including in support departments.  
Best wishes,
William Robins
Operations Director
Keystone Law"

Anyone interested, please email

Fantastic work from Keystone. Please, anyone else, let ROF know.


Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
25/11/2016 00:00
Rate it
Who wants to merge with a big steamer? No chance
anonymous user
25/11/2016 09:16
Rate it
It was known as the most hateful place to work in the City. This can't be a surprise.
anonymous user
25/11/2016 10:27
Rate it
I certainly hope the city steps up to rescue the trainees. Non of them played a part in this mess.
anonymous user
25/11/2016 10:29
Rate it
I certainly hope the city steps up to rescue the trainees. Non of them played a part in this mess.
anonymous user
25/11/2016 14:19
Rate it
^ you can say that again
anonymous user
25/11/2016 14:38
Rate it
I certainly hope the city steps up to rescue the support staff. Non of them played a part in this mess.
anonymous user
25/11/2016 15:33
Rate it
With such a dog eat dog culture, it was always eventually going to eat itself. Have to feel sorrry for the beasted juniors and trainees suddenly left with nothing.
anonymous user
27/11/2016 17:28
Rate it
Completely agree re rescuing people - let's be honest that goes for everyone outside of management/partnership since collectively all employees are now facing unemployment.
I have a new username
28/11/2016 09:40
Rate it
Can someone explain Roll On Friday's obsession with coming to the aid of trainees, to the exclusion of all other employed staff?

Associates, support staff etc. are more likely to have children or other dependants, mortgages, school fees and other obligations that would make their loss of job far more life changing and stressful than that of a trainee who, for the most part, has invested very little time in his/her career to date, probably lives in rented accommodation and is relatively young, mobile and unencumbered.

The plight of all the employees merits consideration, but if one was to choose any particular category of staff for particular mention or consideration, trainees would not immediately occur to me to merit a place at the top of the list.
anonymous user
28/11/2016 10:56
Rate it
In reply to 'I have a new username', whilst I agree that it is important to be concerned for all of the staff, and you raise a good point that they may be older with families and other commitments (although I know plenty of older trainees who have these too), there is a good reason for trainees to be at the top of the list. The other staff, be they associates or support staff, can relatively easily apply for a similar job at a similar level of seniority. Trainees on the other hand will be left in limbo, a chunk of the way into their training contract and not yet qualified. I think it will be easier for other staff will be able to find a firm to work at than it will be for trainees to find another firm to let them complete their training and potentially offer an NQ role, given that they will not have gone through the lengthy trainee recruitment processes for that firm.
anonymous user
28/11/2016 11:25
Rate it
In response to the above comment^, associates/support staff are able and to approach other firms and apply for new jobs whereas trainees are not able to do that for a variety of (contractual/non-contractual) reasons.
anonymous user
28/11/2016 12:51
Rate it
Given that Keystone Law is a virtual law firm and is only interested in taking a %of the profits from a lawyer, it seems a tad disingenuous in making the above offer...
28/11/2016 20:22
Rate it
KWM staff.

When updating your profile, as sadly you have all done, could you please indicate your current team in the current job description.

Please also link to your colleagues so users can quickly trace the department.

Just saying :)

Weekly Email Update

To receive a weekly European email update, please login or register to RollOnFriday.