Clyde & Co has found itself plastered all over the national press as it gears up for an employment tribunal brought by a former equity partner. The partner alleges she was booted out of the firm after revealing a culture of bribery in its office in Tanzania.

Clydes has twice tried to stall Krista Bates van Winkelhof's claim. First it appealed to the court to stay proceedings whilst alternative dispute mechanisms stipulated under the partnership agreement were explored. But the High Court ruled against the firm. More recently, it attempted to get the claim thrown out for lack of jurisdiction. But whilst Clydes was successful at the pre-hearing review, the Employment Appeals Tribunal overturned the decision ruling that van Winkelhof was a "worker" therefore entitled to make protected disclosures as a whistleblower, according to a Lawyer report.

Van Winkelhof had previously worked at Shadbolts, which seconded her to Ako Law in Tanzania. She transferred to Clydes when it merged with Shadbolts, joining the firm's equity partnership in February 2010. She swiftly rose to prominence, becoming Tanzania's number one lawyer according to PLC Which Lawyer?. But life in paradise was not all it seemed, and Van Winkelhof grew suspicious of her Managing Partner, Kibuta Ongwamuhana, who she claims admitted paying bribes to secure work and influence the outcome of cases. She reported him to Clydes' money laundering officers.

    Whistle-blowing

According to van Winkelhof, she was sacked by Ako Law the day after reporting the alleged bribes (although she's still on the firm's website) and returned to London, but was then ejected from Clydes' partnership in January 2011. Van Winkelhof claims the firm kicked her out for reporting the bribes and/or because of her pregnancy. Clydes denies the allegations.

The full hearing is scheduled for later this month.

Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 08 June 12 18:37

Actually, she was found to be both an employee and a worker. Questions for laywers...if overseas partners (law, finance, accounting - i.e. those on the front line) can't blow the whistle and be protected, then what does it mean for great, far reaching legislation like the Bribery Act?

Anonymous 22 June 12 08:51

The claims made about the above mentioned Ako Law partner come of no surprise to me. I say this as I have had dealings with him in the past whilst working at Clyde's.