{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
Register
|
Login
The News
Inside Info
Jobs
Training Contracts
Blogs
Discussion
Useful Stuff
My Profile
About Us
Cookies
UK Firm of the Year
Aussie Firm of the Year
UK City Firms
UK Regional Firms
Aussie Firms
Firm of the Year Stories
Your Firm
>
Inside Info
>
Law Firm Europe News
Follow RoF
For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook
Asia-Pacific
Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the
Asia Pacific Headline
page.
Law Firm News Stories
Queen's solicitors knew News of the World was lying...
21 October 2011
Rate it
0
A partner at
Farrer & Co
has admitted that he kept secret the fact that his client, News International, had misled Parliament.
Julian Pike told a committee of MPs last week that News International had seen evidence which suggested that several journalists had been involved in phone hacking. And as such, its assertion to Parliament that the whole sorry affair was down to just one rogue reporter was untrue.
Pike said that he had been unable to disclose this fact because of client confidentiality. When asked how he would view a headline reading "
Queen's solicitors knew News of the World was lying and did nothing about it
", he replied that it "
is obviously not ideal
". Sorry to disappoint you Pike!
Stupid boy...
RollOnFriday spoke to an expert in Parliamentary law who said that Pike was not formally under an obligation to disclose the facts*, although he should have informed his client of the consequences of perjury. Although if he did, it seems the news went down like a lead balloon: News International has just moved all its phone-hacking work over to
Olswang
. The
Faustian pact
by the media firm is clearly bearing fruit.
A spokesman for Farrers said that the firm was still acting for News International in other matters.
*He added that in theory MPs could claim that Pike's lack of disclosure had interfered with Parliamentary process, do him for contempt and lock him up. But he'd be surprised if such a thing had happened in the last 200 years, so Pike's probably off the hook on that one.
<
Previous Story
Next Story
>
Comments
Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our
terms and conditions.
Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.
Please keep it nice. Thanks.
Order By:
Date
Rating
anonymous user
21/10/2011 12:42
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
If they're prepared to crawl through the sh*t and lousy rates just to say they do the ghastly Windsor's dirty work, what do you think they'd be prepared to do for a client they can charge real money ?
anonymous user
27/10/2011 10:39
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Distasteful as it seems, client confidentiality is not a principle lawyers should utilise when they feel like it. Pike did the right thing - or else the SRA would have him struck off!