Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   

Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.

Law Firm News Stories

166 redundancies at Eversheds
25 January 2013
Rate it
0

Eversheds confirmed yesterday that 166 jobs were at risk throughout its worldwide network.

Numbers are pretty evenly split between business service roles and legal jobs, and include an unspecified number of partners. They also include the firm's entire Copenhagen office, which is to be shut down. That accounts for 30 jobs, although there's a hope that they may be transferred to another firm.

The unfortunate victims of this latest round of redundancies will be offered an enhanced financial package. Lee Ranson, the firm's Managing Partner, told RollOnFriday that the job losses were very sad news but reflected the state of the market. But while it's true that redundancies are far from rare at the moment, few firms have underestimated the "state of the market" so badly as to need six (count 'em) redundancy rounds since the start of the credit crunch.
 
Ranson added that a great deal of work had gone into the process to try to ensure that no further rounds will be necessary. Here's hoping.

    Unless you're at Eversheds

Bryan Hughes, Eversheds' Chief Exec, said that "some markets in which we operate have undergone fundamental change rendering our current structure unsustainable". In the UK, that means the real estate and company/commercial departments.

He added that as many staff as possible would be redeployed. However, based on law firms' past performances in this respect, Eversheds' staff shouldn't be holding their breath waiting for last minute salvation.

Previous Story   Next Story >

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
25/01/2013 09:03
Rate it
-26
Report as offensive
A difficult decision but at least those going are getting an enhanced package - it sounds like they have learned from previous experience. Per Ardua ad astra!
anonymous user
25/01/2013 10:10
Rate it
6
Report as offensive
and this at a time when the managing partner is swanning about as the cover story on the Lawyer...
anonymous user
25/01/2013 13:05
Rate it
4
Report as offensive
I expect they weren't aware of the timing of the article.


anonymous user
25/01/2013 16:08
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
Sounds fitting with the current climate unfortunately. Hopefully those 'enhanced financial packages' will hold some comfort.
anonymous user
25/01/2013 16:23
Rate it
29
Report as offensive
The enhanced package is not as "enhanced" as publicised I suspect. Typical Eversheds PR stunt by attempting to sugarcoat the truth.
anonymous user
25/01/2013 17:32
Rate it
5
Report as offensive
What a load of crap!! As a previous 'sheds support staff employee, I can say with great experience that any "enhanced" redundancy package will still be the bare minimum. After all, it was already decided and documented on the firms document sharing software that the last round had already been agreed before "talks" had even begin with the employees......- fait a comply once again eh Eversheds????
anonymous user
25/01/2013 22:48
Rate it
38
Report as offensive
I can honestly say as a current employee that while the culture at Eversheds used to be collegiate, that is now sadly long gone. The current senior mangement team is more concerned with the bottom line than any lip service paid to the needs or expectations of its staff. It's a horrible firm that is very underhand and also tells lies about the whereabouts of longstanding and respected staff members it has secretly made redundant. The officially announced figures of jobs at risk is by no means the true picture of the number of longstanding people who have just disappeared over the past few months with packages so poorly paid they have had to be legally challenged (where the firm has been forced to eventually pay the proper entitlements). Ultimately, Eversheds is a struggling mid tier firm and a very nasty one at that. The number of comments the hopeless PR team at Eversheds is making on this site to try and control and stifle the debate is also completely laughable. Defending the indefensible.
anonymous user
26/01/2013 01:05
Rate it
34
Report as offensive
Gone are the days when it was a nice place to work!! Now it is all backstabbing!!! Eversheds have had their day!!
anonymous user
26/01/2013 08:41
Rate it
-44
Report as offensive
I think you current 'employers' must be working in a different company to me! like any company there are 'politics' try finding somewhere that there isn't! I guess you will be resigning then?

No I didn't think so! try applying somewhere and see where it gets you!
anonymous user
26/01/2013 09:41
Rate it
2
Report as offensive
Redundancy package is double the min according to a mate of mine that got nudged out this time round. It's a law firm, you have come to expect it.
smurphy
26/01/2013 09:56
Rate it
-2
Report as offensive
I am amazed that you ex-employees think that you have some sort of insider knowledge, you can say from experience that the package will be basic yet everyone else says enhanced - put your money where your mouth is come on what's the package you get it right I will pay £200 into any charity you like If your wrong make it £2000 to my chosen charity - what do you say
smurphy
26/01/2013 10:34
Rate it
-2
Report as offensive
The redundancy numbers seem to vary a bit but my direct feedback is defo double or v.close to it! I hope my co. will be up there when its my turn!
anonymous user
26/01/2013 20:45
Rate it
-33
Report as offensive
Anon- 22.48: I'm not sure how it can be classed as a mid-tier Firm considering the level of PEP that has been reported lately. Their clients are mainly high brow that wouldn't put up with them if they weren't any good at what they do.

I'd be interested to know how exactly you make someone "secretly" redundant, and why you think that the reported numbers are false???
anonymous user
28/01/2013 18:39
Rate it
36
Report as offensive
You make someone "secretly" redundant by coming to a "mutual agreement" with them that they will leave rather than being pushed out, without following redundancy procedures. I remember from my time at Eversheds that it happened a lot - people just disappeared.
anonymous user
30/01/2013 09:39
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Considering a lot of companies are going bust and staff get next to no notice or pay out, I would say Eversheds are dealing with the unavoidable redundancies is the best, most fair way possible.
Stoned Island
31/01/2013 16:32
Rate it
3
Report as offensive
Who are Eversheds?
anonymous user
06/02/2013 13:45
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
Wrong, "Stoned Island" -- the question is not "what are Eversheds?" -- rather, "who were Eversheds?". They are going downhill quickly. And Hughes cannot be let off the hook -- of course he was aware of when he was going to be cover-boy for The Lawyer.
anonymous user
07/04/2013 11:37
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
The question was never "what are Eversheds"
jayjay88
08/04/2013 13:56
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
I worked for eversheds for 5 years and i was not lucky enough to make the cut 99.9% staff are trying so hard to get out it has to be the worst place i have ever worked.To many gaffers to many *******