Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.

My Profile

Check all your messages, update your blog, change your account details,  find friends and much more on the My Profile section.

Main Discussion

Rate it
Report as offensive
Shami's Chakra botti
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:06
Funds are facing increasing regulatory pressure but have been doing bad things for an age while the banks have been getting pasted. The searchlight is raking over the undergrowth and is about to hover over them now. This is why they are hiring lawyers whereas before they would go to externals if they needed to (when they couldn't "deal" the risk away with half a basis point on the next one). I would say that these are about to be some of the grizzliest in house roles going. All the questions and none of the answers, plus business leads who are the least acclimatised to being told what to do by lawyers.

Good luck and may God have mercy on your soul.

pancake humper
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:08
Report as offensive
What kind of place? Small west-end hedge fund or Blackrock is gonna be a v different experience.
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:12
Report as offensive
I have no direct knowledge but these sorts of regulatory roles (if that's what you're talking about) sound bloody awful. Your job would be to tell your boss that he / she can't do lots of things they've been doing for years and really want to continue doing.
January Sails
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:16
Report as offensive
If it's in-house for a reasonable sized property fund it's probably pretty civilised and you'll have to the chance to invest some of your own cash, etc. If it's at some kind of hard core private equity fund it will be a nightmare with you on call permanently.
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:26
Report as offensive
cheers for comments. interesting feedback that has certainly given food for thought. to clarify, it is not property focused and more a west end type set up.
Asturias es mi patria
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:31
Report as offensive
Jbus Botti, it's not that bad

*takes off rosy sunglasses and screams*
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:44
Report as offensive
Don't you just fvck all the work off to Simmons if it's a hedge fund?
Posted - 20 April 2017 17:49
Report as offensive
Yep massively depends.

Pros are definitely salary, bonus prospects and the chance of earning more than PP lawyers. Incredibly demanding but still better life balance than being in PP.

Disagree re the 'not being acclimatised to being told what to do'. I've found business side - especially to the extent they have US backgrounds - to be very respectful of legal advice and entirely used to being constrained.

Not sure I'd fancy a compliance-only role though, transactional elements will be important if you're going to make good £.