Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.

My Profile

Check all your messages, update your blog, change your account details,  find friends and much more on the My Profile section.

Main Discussion

Rate it
Report as offensive
Posted - 20 March 2017 10:57
Posted - 20 March 2017 11:00
Report as offensive
Haven't the rules changed for newer members, though? I genuinely am not sure, but thought that all members after 2020 had to be in the Eurozone and new members wouldn't be able to opt out?
Posted - 20 March 2017 11:02
Report as offensive
The scots will argue they aren't "new" members presumably.

Everyone will point and laugh at them and then make them sign up for the giant ponzi scheme that is the Euro.

The rest of the UK will also have to join the Eurozone once we come skulking back to them in circa 2025 when Brexit has fvcked our entire economy.
January Sails
Posted - 20 March 2017 11:04
Report as offensive
Given what Mr. Verhofstadt has been saying since the Brexit vote I can't see him agreeing to any new members without them adopting the Euro and agreeing to support the full federalisation project.
Posted - 20 March 2017 11:05
Report as offensive
Re what Saillaw said - it's that mindless YOU MUST JOIN WITH NO QUESTIONS ASKED mentality which makes me nervous. The Euro has monumentally fcked some countries over.
Posted - 20 March 2017 11:12
Report as offensive
Clergs, the problem with the comparison is that Sweden actually controls its own currency, whereas if Scotland were to continue using the £ they would not.
Posted - 20 March 2017 11:37
Report as offensive
Oh dear God it's 2010-2014 again. Nothing has changed. If the SNP cannot get cast iron guarantee of membership from the EU then any call for and Indyref repeat is an utterly pointless and divisive exercise in national self-harm.
Posted - 20 March 2017 12:17
Report as offensive
depends what they go for, they might stop at EFTA or EEA membership

obviously there are risks to the Euro but the scottish economy is not the greek or spanish, much closer to dutch or austrian

there is a lot of potential benefit when you're not getting bled on FX loss, especially with the new consumer and delivery that would make it easier to buy stuff and ship it across the continent

would have to consider it at the time, if the UK looks like a basket case by that time it might be the lesser of two evils
Posted - 20 March 2017 12:28
Report as offensive

there are 3 options

1. keep sterling (nothing treasury can do to prevent that unless they want to make it a closed currency)

2. join the euro and use the euro (might be a pre condition of membership of EU, might not. I actually think they should agree with the EU to just use it regardless. Being able to say "we'll use this and the EU agreed would severely damage the impact of this issue)

3. make a new currency that is (at least for a bit) pegged to sterling/dollar/euro

what you go for depends what your international trade policy is, if it is "get back into EU or very EU adjacent" then Euro is probably a good bet. If not then maybe new currency or sterling/sterling peg is the way to go

The most damaging thing though is a sort of fudge of saying nothing. There is a perception that the treasury can control who uses pounds so it has a stronger voice when it says "we will hoover them all up"
Posted - 20 March 2017 12:30
Report as offensive
what would you call your new currency Clerghers:




Posted - 20 March 2017 12:43
Report as offensive
Accession states have fingers crossed behind their backs when they sign the treaties, knowing conditions they sign up to won't be enforced, or they can manipulate them ad nauseam.

The big difference for indy Scots might be that they have to stop printing Scottish Sterling banknotes. Have to invent a new currency if they want to keep printing money.
Third Half
Posted - 20 March 2017 13:16
Report as offensive
INdependent Scotland has three options

(1) Join (if permitted) EU but join the Euro (currently apparently not merely impossible but at reported 9 per cent deficit uninvisagible [is that a word?; I think not; but it is now one and should be applied])

(2) Keep the BoE pound as per US$ and countries like Ecuador (once, not sure about now) or Argentina in the 1990s. Has its uses to curb rampant inflation but needs backing from serious raw materials etc. I can come back to this on observation in multiple places which have used and tried.

(3) Establish a floating/fixed Scottish pound (the 'jimmy') (have to be outside EU though) but whoa betide it.

Perhaps Nicola could claim that the BoE 's gold sold by Brown was done without Scots' consent and they want a portion of it back (at independence day plus interest)