Firm of the Year

Pass judgment on your firm and take the RollOnFriday Firm of the Year 2018 survey. 20 seconds of graft for a lifetime of satisfaction. If you're in-house, there's a poll for you, too
  

GlamSol 2017

  

Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.
  

Glamour

Glamour
The legendary Glamorous Solicitor showcases the style, the beauty and the sophistication for which the legal profession is so rightly known.
  

News

Send Us Your News
Norton Rose Fulbright merger target mired in sexual discrimination scandal
13 April 2017
Rate it
0

The US firm set to merge with Norton Rose Fulbright is embroiled in a feud with three female partners and is voting to expel one of them from the partnership after she sued it for sexual discrimination.

Last September Chadbourne & Parke litigation partner Kerrie Campbell filed a federal sex discrimination claim accusing the firm of routinely underpaying women. Campbell sued for $100 million because, well, that's just a really big pile of money but somehow it seems about right. However she upset most of her fellow female partners by framing her complaint as a class action which included all of them. 14 of the 15 other female partners wrote an open letter of support for the firm, in which they rejected her attempt to represent them.

Chadbourne's partners have now decided to hold a vote to expel Campbell from the partnership. And because US lawyers like to wash their dirty linen in public, they have accused her in a statement of a "failure to deliver" as a partner and said she had made "baseless claims in the cynical pursuit of a big and undeserved payday". 

However two other Chadbourne women have now joined Campbell's sex discrimination claim. One is Jaroslawa Johnson, a former partner in Chadbourne's Kiev office. The other is Mary Yelenick, a 35-year Chadbourne veteran whose name was missing from the anti-Campbell letter and who now says that “during my employment, I believe Chadbourne paid me less than men who performed similar work”. 

  Campbell, Yelenick and Johnson v The Man (and 14 Women)

When RollOnFriday queried the absence of Yelenick's signature on the letter last year, a spokesman for Chadbourne said she was out of the country. But this week the lawyer representing the three rogue women, David Sanford, said that "while Ms. Yelenick was indeed traveling during the period when other women partners at the firm reportedly signed the letter, she had been shown the letter and had declined to sign the letter prior to leaving for her trip".

In a rambling statement an excitable spokesman for Chadbourne said that Campbell's claim was "riddled with falsehoods", that Yelenick’s allegations "are plainly false" and that "no one in Firm leadership pressured Ms. Yelenick or any other female partner to sign the letter".

This article has been an advisory notice for Norton Rose Fulbright that it is about to get into bed with a big bag of crazy.
 

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

anonymous user
13/04/2017 16:37
Rate it
2
Report as offensive
I actually love how openly venomous the mercin lawyers are. Entertaining at least. Could do with more of it in the UK.
anonymous user
13/04/2017 17:06
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
LOLZ sexual discrimination = bag of crazy. Okay Roll On Friday
  

Weekly Email Update

To receive a weekly European email update, please login or register to RollOnFriday.