Make Me...

...an anonymous source. Send your news here.
  

Find a Job

With the market picking up, don't miss out on Job Search for all the best vacancies from the World's leading law firms.
  

Discussion

Discussion
The discussion board has the answers to all life's questions. Get advice on how to get a job, where to work, how your salary matches up and where to go after hours.
  

Blogs

RollOnFriday inadvertently shops a law firm to the Lord Chamberlain

Rate it
0
31 August 2017 15:25
I wrote a story last week on Reece Law, a firm made up of a bunch of paralegals. A salesman had been trying to drum up some referrals. He described a potential client who was suspicious of a firm containing no qualified solicitors as a “fucking retard”. He also came up with the immortal line “"it appears to me she is giving out false legal advice!! she need to leave that to us".

The firm, which was quick to distance itself from this charmer, brands itself as follows:

     

The designer was clearly a childhood fan of Rex and Tex in the Funday Times:

     

Cartoons aside, surely there must be some restriction on ripping off royal armorial images. I emailed my old chum Peter O’Donoghue who is York Herald at the College of Arms. He said that “the use of the lion and unicorn in this way is almost certainly unlawful. This kind of thing is dealt with by my senior colleague Garter King of Arms who works with the Lord Chamberlain's Department.” And he sent it on to him.

Peter emailed me the next day. “Garter advises that this fake coat of Arms is a doctored version of the Royal Arms of Canada. It is certainly unlawful and would seem likely to be contrary to the Trade Marks Act 1994, which forbids the use of Arms suggestive of Royal authorisation; and the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, which forbids giving an indication of Royal approval. He is I believe passing it on to the Lord Chamberlain's Office.”

Oh dear.


  

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

anonymous user
31/08/2017 16:25
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
Are Tex and Rex similarly unlawful? Will Murdoch be joining the angry paralegals in the Tower?
3-ducks
31/08/2017 17:06
Rate it
7
Report as offensive
Don't mess with the College of Arms!
SumoKing
01/09/2017 07:42
Rate it
23
Report as offensive
"my old chum Peter O’Donoghue who is York Herald at the College of Arms"

RoF, the voice of the people
anonymous user
01/09/2017 09:02
Rate it
3
Report as offensive
You bloody grass!
anonymous user
01/09/2017 09:40
Rate it
2
Report as offensive
I heard the Lord Chamberlain's office is swamped at this time of year.
anonymous user
01/09/2017 19:31
Rate it
1
Report as offensive
snitch!
anonymous user
04/09/2017 10:59
Rate it
3
Report as offensive
Anon 16:25 31/08 defence of fair dealings, s.30A Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 confers protection for parody and comedic works.
anonymous user
08/09/2017 15:14
Rate it
0
Report as offensive
anon 04/09/2017 10:59
s.30A is a potential defence to copyright infringement, it has no bearing on the provisions of the Trade Marks Act 1994 or Trade Descriptions Act 1968.......